All bills

HR 29

requesting an opinion of the justices on the scope of part II, article 4 of the New Hampshire constitution, as well as other related articles.

Filed 2026 · Killed · Judiciary · State Government

Official record at gencourt.state.nh.us ↗

Open this bill in the searchable view →  ·  Follow this bill by RSS

On the record

Quoted from the General Court bill status page, not worked out from the docket.

StatusHOUSE
In the HouseINEXPEDIENT TO LEGISLATE
Introduced1/7/2026
Floor date3/5/2026
LSR number2327
Local government impactno
Committee codeH10

Bill text (PDF) ↗

Where it stands

House: INEXPEDIENT TO LEGISLATE

Every floor vote on this bill was a voice or division vote, so there is no record of how individual legislators voted.

A bill goes on the consent calendar when the committee vote was unanimous or nearly so, and any members who dissented did not object to placing it there. It then passes without floor debate. Ten members may file a petition to pull a bill off the consent calendar and have it debated and voted on separately.

Sponsors

McFarlane, Donald(R) Graf 18, Moffett, Michael(R) Merr 4, Murphy, Mary(R) Hills 27, Sellers, John(R) Graf 10, Ulery, Jordan(R) Hills 13, Wherry, Robert(R) Hills 13
Prime sponsor in bold. From the General Court sponsor file.

What happened

Every action recorded in the official docket, in order. Each line ends with the journal or calendar that recorded it; where we have the document, that citation links to it.

Votes

Roll call tallies and individual votes from the General Court roll call files. Presiding, excused and absent are shown separately: one member presides over each House roll call and does not vote except to break a tie.

Inexpedient to Legislate

March 5, 2026 · House · None–None, adopted

Decided on a voice vote. Only the outcome was recorded — there is no count of how any member voted.

Committee reports

Reproduced from the House Calendar in the committee’s own words.

Committee — INEXPEDIENT TO LEGISLATE

Rep. Bob Lynn

This resolution would request an Opinion of the Justices from the Supreme Court regarding the scope of Part II, Article 4 of the NH Constitution and other related articles. Some members of the committee are weary of ever requesting an advisory opinion from the court because, unconstrained by the facts and reality of an actual case, there is an increased risk of faulty reasoning or other mischief in such cases. In any event, because this resolution does not pertain to any specific legislation, but merely requests the court, in essence, to write an essay on the referenced constitutional provisions, the court almost certainly would decline such a request. Vote 18-0.

Hearings and recordings

Recordings are the General Court’s own, on YouTube. Start times are estimates unless stated otherwise, and the player opens early.

Page generated 2026-09-03 from data published by the New Hampshire General Court. Granite Record is an independent project, not affiliated with the General Court. The official record always takes precedence. Corrections: [email protected]