All bills

HB 660-FN-LOCAL

requiring historic horse racing facilities to compensate their host communities with a percentage of the revenue generated from their historic horse racing machines.

Filed 2026 · Referred for interim study · Ways and Means · Gambling

Official record at gencourt.state.nh.us ↗

Open this bill in the searchable view →  ·  Follow this bill by RSS

On the record

Quoted from the General Court bill status page, not worked out from the docket.

StatusHOUSE
In the HouseINTERIM STUDY
Introduced1/9/2025
Floor date1/7/2026
LSR number387
Local government impactno
Committee codeH28

Bill text (PDF) ↗

Where it stands

House: INTERIM STUDY

Every floor vote on this bill was a voice or division vote, so there is no record of how individual legislators voted.

House committees sometimes retain a bill to keep working on it, and sometimes as a quiet way to end it.

A retained bill stays with the committee into the second year of the term. Sometimes that means more work is planned, and sometimes it is a quiet ending.

In practice this often ends a bill's progress for the term.

Sponsors

Ohm, Bill(R) Hills 10, Manohar, Sanjeev(D) Hills 9, Almy, Susan(D) Graf 17
Prime sponsor in bold. From the General Court sponsor file.

What happened

Every action recorded in the official docket, in order. Each line ends with the journal or calendar that recorded it; where we have the document, that citation links to it.

Votes

Roll call tallies and individual votes from the General Court roll call files. Presiding, excused and absent are shown separately: one member presides over each House roll call and does not vote except to break a tie.

Refer for Interim Study

January 8, 2026 · House · None–None, adopted

Decided on a voice vote. Only the outcome was recorded — there is no count of how any member voted.

Committee reports

Reproduced from the House Calendar in the committee’s own words.

Majority — REFER FOR INTERIM STUDY

Rep. James Tierney

During the discussions on this bill, several very good questions arose from both sides of the debate, and two amendments were proposed. However, there were no solutions presented that the committee was able to agree on. The majority of the committee also felt that since the Racing and Charitable Gaming Study Commission will work on an issue such as this, Interim Study was appropriate at this time. Vote 16-4.

Minority — OUGHT TO PASS WITH AMENDMENT

Rep. Bill Ohm

The minority of the committee recognizes the charge of the recently convened Racing and Charitable Gaming Study Commission to address the amount of funds going to charity. However, those funds are likely to exceed $60 million in the current year, funds raised by new taxes on gaming. The minority feels that a portion of this tax money is better allocated to mitigate costs in the hosting jurisdictions, rather than given away to charity. And once the charity funds are allocated, it will be increasingly difficult to change the distribution model. The minority of the committee recommends that the Interim Study recommendation be voted down so that amendment 2025-2977h might be considered. The amendment would allocate 50% of the tax revenue to charity, 30% to the hosting municipality, 10% to the county, and 10% to the abutting municipalities.

Hearings and recordings

Recordings are the General Court’s own, on YouTube. Start times are estimates unless stated otherwise, and the player opens early.

Page generated 2026-09-03 from data published by the New Hampshire General Court. Granite Record is an independent project, not affiliated with the General Court. The official record always takes precedence. Corrections: [email protected]