HB 652-FN
abolishing the family division, creating the office of family mediation, and reassigning the jurisdiction of the family division.
Official record at gencourt.state.nh.us ↗Open this bill in the searchable view → · Follow this bill by RSS
On the record
Quoted from the General Court bill status page, not worked out from the docket.
| Status | HOUSE |
|---|---|
| In the House | DIED ON THE TABLE |
| Introduced | 1/9/2025 |
| Floor date | 2/19/2026 |
| LSR number | 295 |
| Local government impact | no |
| Committee code | H37 |
Where it stands
House: DIED ON THE TABLE
Every floor vote on this bill was a voice or division vote, so there is no record of how individual legislators voted.
House committees sometimes retain a bill to keep working on it, and sometimes as a quiet way to end it.
A retained bill stays with the committee into the second year of the term. Sometimes that means more work is planned, and sometimes it is a quiet ending.
In practice this often ends a bill's progress for the term.
A bill goes on the consent calendar when the committee vote was unanimous or nearly so, and any members who dissented did not object to placing it there. It then passes without floor debate. Ten members may file a petition to pull a bill off the consent calendar and have it debated and voted on separately.
The bill was set aside during the session and never taken back up, so it died when the session ended.
Sponsors
Bernardy, JD(R) Rock 36, Sabourin dit Choinière, Matt(R) Rock 30, DeRoy, Susan(R) Straf 3, Post, Lisa(R) Hills 42
Prime sponsor in bold. From the General Court sponsor file.
What happened
Every action recorded in the official docket, in order. Each line ends with the journal or calendar that recorded it; where we have the document, that citation links to it.
- January 9, 2025Introduced (in recess of) 01/09/2025 and referred to Children and Family Law
- February 11, 2025Public Hearing: 02/11/2025 01:30 pm LOB 206-208
- March 4, 2025Executive Session: 03/04/2025 11:00 am LOB 206-208
- March 5, 2025Retained in Committee
- September 30, 2025Executive Session: 09/30/2025 11:00 am GP 230
- October 2, 2025Majority Committee Report: Inexpedient to Legislate 09/30/2025 (Vote 12-2; RC)
- October 2, 2025Minority Committee Report: Refer for Interim Study
- January 7, 2026Recommit (Rep. DeSimone): MA DV 183-161 01/07/2026
- February 10, 2026Executive Session: 02/10/2026 10:00 am GP 230
- February 11, 2026Committee Report: Inexpedient to Legislate 02/10/2026 (Vote 15-0; CC)
- February 17, 2026Removed from Consent (Reps. Nalevanko, Kaczynski, Sabourin dit Choiniere, D. Kelley, Barton, Sirois, Perez, DeRoy, Bernardy, Post) 02/16/2026
- February 19, 2026Lay HB652 on Table (Rep. DeSimone): MA DV 268-66 02/19/2026
- August 19, 2026Died on Table, Session ended 08/19/2026
Votes
Roll call tallies and individual votes from the General Court roll call files. Presiding, excused and absent are shown separately: one member presides over each House roll call and does not vote except to break a tie.
Recommit (Rep. DeSimone)
Decided on a division vote. Only the outcome was recorded — there is no count of how any member voted.
Lay HB652 on Table (Rep. DeSimone)
Decided on a division vote. Only the outcome was recorded — there is no count of how any member voted.
Committee reports
Reproduced from the House Calendar in the committee’s own words.
Committee — INEXPEDIENT TO LEGISLATE
The motion to recommend this bill as Inexpedient to Legislate originally passed the committee 12-2. The minority recommendation was to Refer for Interim Study. Rather than bring forth the Inexpedient to Legislate motion at the beginning of the calendar year, the bill was sent back to the Children and Family Law Committee. On February 10 of this year, we discussed the topic of family court further, and came once again to the conclusion the bill should be Inexpedient to Legislate. Our opinion has not changed. If anything, our belief has become stronger that the family court is the right place for family matters to be discussed and decided. Some decades after the establishment of French-style law courts as part of the Norman Conquest of England in 1066, government leadership in England concluded that “equity courts” were needed to be added to existing tort and criminal courts and with such courts functioning with more flexible rules and procedures. The establishment of such new courts was in response to a growing request of the people. For hundreds of years equity courts have served an important function which is why most states and many countries have such. Family court is such a court of equity. Does family court need some work done on it? That was the conclusion of the two-year-long Special Committee on the Family Division of the Circuit Court and some changes were suggested and adopted. We know the work is not yet complete and look forward to more changes being made as members of the Children and Family Law Committee continue the work of reform. Vote 15-0.
Hearings and recordings
Recordings are the General Court’s own, on YouTube. Start times are estimates unless stated otherwise, and the player opens early.
- January 7, 2026House floor debate recording (start time not identified)
- February 10, 2026 at 10:00Children and Family Law executive session recording 1:25:11–1:28:11, about 3 min (estimated)
- February 19, 2026House floor debate recording (start time not identified)
Page generated 2026-09-03 from data published by the New Hampshire General Court. Granite Record is an independent project, not affiliated with the General Court. The official record always takes precedence. Corrections: [email protected]