All bills

HB 1814-FN

establishing a 10-year strategic housing and infrastructure plan.

Filed 2026 · Died on the table · Housing · State Government

Official record at gencourt.state.nh.us ↗

Open this bill in the searchable view →  ·  Follow this bill by RSS

On the record

Quoted from the General Court bill status page, not worked out from the docket.

StatusHOUSE
In the HouseDIED ON THE TABLE
Introduced1/7/2026
Floor date2/19/2026
LSR number2866
Local government impactno
Committee codeH64

Bill text (PDF) ↗

Where it stands

House: DIED ON THE TABLE

Every floor vote on this bill was a voice or division vote, so there is no record of how individual legislators voted.

The bill was set aside during the session and never taken back up, so it died when the session ended.

Sponsors

Muns, Chris(D) Rock 29, Altschiller, Debra(D) Rock 24, Booras, Efstathia(D) Hills 8, Hegner, Karen(D) Hills 41, Howland, Allan(D) Straf 20, Lane, Connie(D) Merr 16, Maggiore, Jim(D) Rock 23, Paige, David(D) Carr 1, Perkins Kwoka, Rebecca(D) Rock 21, Read, Ellen(D) Rock 10, Stavis, Laurel(D) Graf 13, de Vries, Erica(D) Rock 29
Prime sponsor in bold. From the General Court sponsor file.

What happened

Every action recorded in the official docket, in order. Each line ends with the journal or calendar that recorded it; where we have the document, that citation links to it.

Votes

Roll call tallies and individual votes from the General Court roll call files. Presiding, excused and absent are shown separately: one member presides over each House roll call and does not vote except to break a tie.

Lay HB1814 on Table (Rep. Alexander Jr.)

February 19, 2026 · House · None–None, adopted

Decided on a voice vote. Only the outcome was recorded — there is no count of how any member voted.

Remove from Table (Rep. Wade)

March 11, 2026 · House · 123–207, failed

Decided on a division vote. Only the outcome was recorded — there is no count of how any member voted.

Committee reports

Reproduced from the House Calendar in the committee’s own words.

Majority — INEXPEDIENT TO LEGISLATE

Rep. Calvin Beaulier

This bill is a bureaucratic, centralized, state led approach to housing which will generate more square feet of paperwork than square feet of housing. It creates a massive new government program “modeled after the statewide transportation improvement program.” The plan does not actually build any housing directly, but appears to be a plan about planning for housing. In addition to the Governor, this plan requires participation from the Council on Housing Stability (which is getting three new members picked by the New Hampshire Municipal Association), each metropolitan planning organization, each rural regional planning commission, the Division of Planning and Community Development within the Department of Business and Economic Affairs, and each municipality with a master plan which must now complete a “housing progress review” every five years. The plan is then submitted to the General Court each even numbered year on January 15th which must act on it by June 1 the same year. The fiscal note is incomplete as the Governor’s Office has not responded to the Office of Legislative Budget Assistant. This is concerning since the Governor is tasked with developing this plan. New Hampshire’s problem is not a lack of government planning, it’s a lack of housing. This bill will not fix that, only property rights and free markets can fix that. Vote 10-8.

Minority — OUGHT TO PASS WITH AMENDMENT

Rep. Allan Howland

Master plans provide the vision and rules that guide community development. Unfortunately, some of these plans are not revised for decades and as a result, the addition of new housing is stifled. Since the master plan provides the framework for a community development, long periods of inactivity stifle housing growth. This amendment would require municipalities that have adopted master plans but have not revised them in 10 years to review them and determine if amendments or revisions are needed. Additionally, five years after adopting a master plan, a housing progress review that included the latest regional housing needs assessment would be required. This would help the community determine if zoning regulations and incentives were effective and to make changes if they are not. These reviews would be shared with the Division of Planning and Community Development, which would be used to help coordinate state, regional, and municipal planning. The potential benefits of these changes to the planning process are why the minority of the committee recommends Ought to Pass with Amendment.

Hearings and recordings

Recordings are the General Court’s own, on YouTube. Start times are estimates unless stated otherwise, and the player opens early.

Page generated 2026-09-03 from data published by the New Hampshire General Court. Granite Record is an independent project, not affiliated with the General Court. The official record always takes precedence. Corrections: [email protected]