HB 1725-FN
relative to the regulation of artificial intelligence technologies.
Official record at gencourt.state.nh.us ↗Open this bill in the searchable view → · Follow this bill by RSS
On the record
Quoted from the General Court bill status page, not worked out from the docket.
| Status | HOUSE |
|---|---|
| In the House | INEXPEDIENT TO LEGISLATE |
| Introduced | 1/7/2026 |
| Floor date | 2/19/2026 |
| LSR number | 2812 |
| Local government impact | no |
| Committee code | H43 |
Where it stands
House: INEXPEDIENT TO LEGISLATE
Every floor vote on this bill was a voice or division vote, so there is no record of how individual legislators voted.
A bill goes on the consent calendar when the committee vote was unanimous or nearly so, and any members who dissented did not object to placing it there. It then passes without floor debate. Ten members may file a petition to pull a bill off the consent calendar and have it debated and voted on separately.
Sponsors
Long, Patrick(D) Hills 26
Prime sponsor in bold. From the General Court sponsor file.
What happened
Every action recorded in the official docket, in order. Each line ends with the journal or calendar that recorded it; where we have the document, that citation links to it.
- January 7, 2026Introduced 01/07/2026 and referred to Commerce and Consumer Affairs
- January 15, 2026Public Hearing: 01/15/2026 11:00 am GP 229
- January 22, 2026Subcommittee Work Session: 01/22/2026 01:15 pm GP 229
- February 4, 2026Executive Session: 02/04/2026 01:00 pm GP 229
- February 11, 2026Committee Report: Inexpedient to Legislate 02/04/2026 (Vote 16-0; CC)
- February 19, 2026Inexpedient to Legislate: MA VV 02/19/2026
Votes
Roll call tallies and individual votes from the General Court roll call files. Presiding, excused and absent are shown separately: one member presides over each House roll call and does not vote except to break a tie.
Inexpedient to Legislate
Decided on a voice vote. Only the outcome was recorded — there is no count of how any member voted.
Committee reports
Reproduced from the House Calendar in the committee’s own words.
Committee — INEXPEDIENT TO LEGISLATE
This bill would establish an AI governance framework, including disclosure requirements for AI systems, restrictions on government misuse, such as social scoring, and a regulatory sandbox for testing AI products. The committee recognized the bill’s intent to balance consumer protection with innovation but identified concerns, including the need for clearer definitions and the rapidly evolving nature of AI technology. The bill contains some positive elements, particularly the regulatory sandbox concept, which the sponsor may wish to refine and reintroduce in a future session. Vote 16-0.
Hearings and recordings
Recordings are the General Court’s own, on YouTube. Start times are estimates unless stated otherwise, and the player opens early.
- January 15, 2026 at 11:00Commerce and Consumer Affairs public hearing recording 1:06:05–1:19:55, about 14 min (estimated)
- January 22, 2026 at 13:15Commerce and Consumer Affairs subcommittee work session recording 4:02:30–4:03:00, about 0 min (estimated)
- February 4, 2026 at 13:00Commerce and Consumer Affairs executive session recording 4:31:30–4:34:00, about 2 min (estimated)
- February 19, 2026House floor debate recording (start time not identified)
Page generated 2026-09-03 from data published by the New Hampshire General Court. Granite Record is an independent project, not affiliated with the General Court. The official record always takes precedence. Corrections: [email protected]