All bills

HB 1621-FN

requiring a baseline environmental impact study to be completed prior to development of certain manufacturing and storage facilities.

Filed 2026 · Killed · Environment and Agriculture · Environment - Administration

Official record at gencourt.state.nh.us ↗

Open this bill in the searchable view →  ·  Follow this bill by RSS

On the record

Quoted from the General Court bill status page, not worked out from the docket.

StatusHOUSE
In the HouseINEXPEDIENT TO LEGISLATE
Introduced1/7/2026
Floor date2/19/2026
LSR number2518
Local government impactno
Committee codeH06

Bill text (PDF) ↗

Where it stands

House: INEXPEDIENT TO LEGISLATE

Every floor vote on this bill was a voice or division vote, so there is no record of how individual legislators voted.

A bill goes on the consent calendar when the committee vote was unanimous or nearly so, and any members who dissented did not object to placing it there. It then passes without floor debate. Ten members may file a petition to pull a bill off the consent calendar and have it debated and voted on separately.

Sponsors

Perez, Kristine(R) Rock 16, Andrus, Louise(R) Merr 5, DeRoy, Susan(R) Straf 3, Dunn, Ron(R) Rock 16, McGhee, Kat(D) Hills 35, Thomas, Wendy(D) Hills 12, Wheeler, Jonah(D) Hills 33
Prime sponsor in bold. From the General Court sponsor file.

What happened

Every action recorded in the official docket, in order. Each line ends with the journal or calendar that recorded it; where we have the document, that citation links to it.

Votes

Roll call tallies and individual votes from the General Court roll call files. Presiding, excused and absent are shown separately: one member presides over each House roll call and does not vote except to break a tie.

Inexpedient to Legislate

February 19, 2026 · House · None–None, adopted

Decided on a voice vote. Only the outcome was recorded — there is no count of how any member voted.

Committee reports

Reproduced from the House Calendar in the committee’s own words.

Committee — INEXPEDIENT TO LEGISLATE

Rep. Peter Bixby

This bill would have required a baseline environmental impact study (a comprehensive assessment of the existing environmental conditions at the time of application) as a precondition for permitting development of any manufacturing or storage facility over 50,000 square feet. The intent was to prevent a company like St. Gobain from developing a facility in a community that would then cause substantial environmental harm. The mechanism for performing the study was broad and unclear, the permitting process would be conditioned on the study was not clearly identified, and the correlation between the size of the facility and the potential of environmental harm was unclear. We felt that the underlying intent of the bill was good, but we did not see a path to amending it that would fulfill that intent. Vote 16-0.

Hearings and recordings

Recordings are the General Court’s own, on YouTube. Start times are estimates unless stated otherwise, and the player opens early.

Page generated 2026-09-03 from data published by the New Hampshire General Court. Granite Record is an independent project, not affiliated with the General Court. The official record always takes precedence. Corrections: [email protected]