HB 1472 (2026): relative to the suspension period in cases involving the administrative appeals unit relative to licensure or certification concerning lead paint poisoning prevention.

Cite this page

Granite Record indexes the General Court’s record; it is not that record. Where a citation allows only one source, cite the General Court — every page here links to what it is drawn from. The date below is the day the page was read.

MLA
“HB 1472 (2026): relative to the suspension period in cases involving the administrative appeals unit relative to licensure or certification concerning lead paint poisoning prevention.” Granite Record, https://graniterecord.org/bill/2026/hb1472. Accessed 19 Oct. 2026.
APA
Granite Record. (n.d.). HB 1472 (2026): relative to the suspension period in cases involving the administrative appeals unit relative to licensure or certification concerning lead paint poisoning prevention. Retrieved 19 Oct. 2026, from https://graniterecord.org/bill/2026/hb1472
Chicago
Granite Record. “HB 1472 (2026): relative to the suspension period in cases involving the administrative appeals unit relative to licensure or certification concerning lead paint poisoning prevention.” Accessed 19 Oct. 2026. https://graniterecord.org/bill/2026/hb1472.
BibTeX
@misc{bill-2026-hb1472, title = {HB 1472 (2026): relative to the suspension period in cases involving the administrative appeals unit relative to licensure or certification concerning lead paint poisoning prevention.}, howpublished = {Granite Record}, url = {https://graniterecord.org/bill/2026/hb1472}, note = {Accessed 19 Oct. 2026} }

HB 1472 (2026)

relative to the suspension period in cases involving the administrative appeals unit relative to licensure or certification concerning lead paint poisoning prevention.

  • Status: Killed
  • Term: 2025-2026
  • House committee: Executive Departments and Administration
  • Senate committee: Executive Departments and Administration
  • Subject: Public and Mental Health

The Story

It was introduced on January 7, 2026 and referred to the House Executive Departments and Administration committee. The committee held a public hearing on January 22, 2026, with 2 people signed in online: 2 in opposition. The committee met in executive session on January 22, 2026 to vote on its recommendation. The committee voted unanimously, 12–0, to recommend that the House pass it, and the report was placed on the consent calendar. On February 12, 2026 the House voted to pass it on a voice vote. It crossed to the Senate and was referred to the Senate Executive Departments and Administration committee. The committee held a public hearing on March 11, 2026. The committee voted unanimously, 4–0, to recommend that the Senate kill it. On March 26, 2026 the Senate voted to kill it on a voice vote.

Sponsors

Hearings and Sessions

  • January 22, 2026, 2:30 PM: public hearing, House Executive Departments and Administration, GP 153
  • January 22, 2026, 2:30 PM: executive session, House Executive Departments and Administration, GP 153
  • February 12, 2026: consent calendar, House
  • March 11, 2026, 9:40 AM: hearing, Senate Executive Departments and Administration, SH 103
  • March 26, 2026: consent calendar, Senate

Votes

  • February 12, 2026, House: Ought to Pass — voice vote, passed
  • March 26, 2026, Senate: Inexpedient to Legislate — voice vote, passed

The Docket

  • January 7, 2026: Introduced 01/07/2026 and referred to Executive Departments and Administration
  • January 22, 2026: Public Hearing: 01/22/2026 02:30 pm GP 153
  • January 22, 2026: Executive Session: 01/22/2026 02:30 pm GP 153
  • January 28, 2026: Committee Report: Ought to Pass 01/28/2026 (Vote 12-0; CC)
  • February 5, 2026: Introduced 02/05/2026 and Referred to Executive Departments and Administration
  • February 12, 2026: Ought to Pass: MA VV 02/12/2026
  • March 11, 2026: Hearing: 03/11/2026, Room 103, SH, 09:40 am
  • March 26, 2026: Committee Report: Inexpedient to Legislate, 03/26/2026, Vote 4-0, CC
  • March 26, 2026: Inexpedient to Legislate, MA, VV ; 03/26/2026

Laws It Would Change

From the General Court