HB 1255-FN
removing the requirement of more evidence than a campaign contribution to demonstrate that a vote, appointment or nomination was a corrupt practice.
Official record at gencourt.state.nh.us ↗Open this bill in the searchable view → · Follow this bill by RSS
On the record
Quoted from the General Court bill status page, not worked out from the docket.
| Status | HOUSE |
|---|---|
| In the House | INEXPEDIENT TO LEGISLATE |
| Introduced | 1/7/2026 |
| Floor date | 3/5/2026 |
| LSR number | 2777 |
| Local government impact | no |
| Committee code | H36 |
Where it stands
House: INEXPEDIENT TO LEGISLATE
Every floor vote on this bill was a voice or division vote, so there is no record of how individual legislators voted.
A bill goes on the consent calendar when the committee vote was unanimous or nearly so, and any members who dissented did not object to placing it there. It then passes without floor debate. Ten members may file a petition to pull a bill off the consent calendar and have it debated and voted on separately.
Sponsors
Ankarberg, Aidan(I) Straf 7, Andrus, Louise(R) Merr 5, Perez, Kristine(R) Rock 16, Sirois, Shane(R) Hills 32, Turcotte, Len(R) Straf 4
Prime sponsor in bold. From the General Court sponsor file.
What happened
Every action recorded in the official docket, in order. Each line ends with the journal or calendar that recorded it; where we have the document, that citation links to it.
- January 7, 2026Introduced 01/07/2026 and referred to Election Law
- January 27, 2026Public Hearing: 01/27/2026 01:20 pm GP 158
- February 3, 2026Executive Session: 02/03/2026 10:10 am GP 158
- February 24, 2026Committee Report: Inexpedient to Legislate 02/03/2026 (Vote 15-0; CC)
- March 5, 2026Inexpedient to Legislate: MA VV 03/05/2026
Votes
Roll call tallies and individual votes from the General Court roll call files. Presiding, excused and absent are shown separately: one member presides over each House roll call and does not vote except to break a tie.
Inexpedient to Legislate
Decided on a voice vote. Only the outcome was recorded — there is no count of how any member voted.
Committee reports
Reproduced from the House Calendar in the committee’s own words.
Committee — INEXPEDIENT TO LEGISLATE
This bill would repeal RSA 640:1, thereby removing the requirement that evidence beyond a campaign contribution is necessary to demonstrate that a vote, appointment, or nomination constitutes a corrupt practice. The receipt of campaign contributions by elected officials and candidates for elected office is a lawful activity. Furthermore, voting, making appointments, and submitting nominations are necessary and ethical functions of many elected offices. No information regarding potential public benefits of this bill was presented to the committee. At the scheduled public hearing, no testimony was offered by the sponsor, any co-sponsor, or members of the public. Therefore, it is the view of the Election Law Committee that adopting this statutory change would be contrary to the public interest, and this bill should be found Inexpedient to Legislate. Vote 15-0.
Hearings and recordings
Recordings are the General Court’s own, on YouTube. Start times are estimates unless stated otherwise, and the player opens early.
- January 27, 2026 at 13:20Election Law public hearing recording 3:41:27–3:46:07, about 5 min (estimated)
- February 3, 2026 at 10:10Election Law executive session recording (start time not identified)
- March 5, 2026House floor debate recording (start time not identified)
Page generated 2026-09-03 from data published by the New Hampshire General Court. Granite Record is an independent project, not affiliated with the General Court. The official record always takes precedence. Corrections: [email protected]