All bills

HB 1243-FN

relative to contracting and investment decisions by executive branch agencies.

Filed 2026 · Killed · Executive Departments and Administration · State Government

Official record at gencourt.state.nh.us ↗

Open this bill in the searchable view →  ·  Follow this bill by RSS

On the record

Quoted from the General Court bill status page, not worked out from the docket.

StatusHOUSE
In the HouseINEXPEDIENT TO LEGISLATE
Introduced1/7/2026
Floor date2/5/2026
LSR number3142
Local government impactno
Committee codeH07

Bill text (PDF) ↗

Where it stands

House: INEXPEDIENT TO LEGISLATE

Every floor vote on this bill was a voice or division vote, so there is no record of how individual legislators voted.

A bill goes on the consent calendar when the committee vote was unanimous or nearly so, and any members who dissented did not object to placing it there. It then passes without floor debate. Ten members may file a petition to pull a bill off the consent calendar and have it debated and voted on separately.

Sponsors

Sabourin dit Choinière, Matt(R) Rock 30, Barton, Joseph(R) Graf 1, Granger, Michael(R) Straf 2, Harvey-Bolia, Juliet(R) Belk 3, Kuttab, Katelyn(R) Rock 17, Mannion, Tom(R) Hills 1, Potenza, Kelley(R) Straf 19, Wheeler, Jonah(D) Hills 33
Prime sponsor in bold. From the General Court sponsor file.

What happened

Every action recorded in the official docket, in order. Each line ends with the journal or calendar that recorded it; where we have the document, that citation links to it.

Votes

Roll call tallies and individual votes from the General Court roll call files. Presiding, excused and absent are shown separately: one member presides over each House roll call and does not vote except to break a tie.

Inexpedient to Legislate

February 5, 2026 · House · None–None, adopted

Decided on a voice vote. Only the outcome was recorded — there is no count of how any member voted.

Committee reports

Reproduced from the House Calendar in the committee’s own words.

Committee — INEXPEDIENT TO LEGISLATE

Rep. Jeremy Slottje

This legislation seeks to ensure that all decisions on contracts and investments by state agencies prioritize the direct provision of benefits, services, or goods to New Hampshire citizens however the bill’s language introduces significant complexity that would create uncertainty in day-to-day government operations. Phrases such as “solely in the interest of, “and” for the exclusive purpose of providing benefits, services, and goods” and prohibitions on considering “interests, policies, or objectives extraneous to or inconsistent with this purpose” are overly broad and open to multiple interpretations. This ambiguity could lead to endless disputes over what qualifies as a “direct benefit” to granite staters, burdening agencies with subjective judgments rather than clear, workable standards. Even the exceptions for federal requirements or multi-state programs are phrased in ways that invite further legal challenges and administrative confusion. Vote 13-1.

Hearings and recordings

Recordings are the General Court’s own, on YouTube. Start times are estimates unless stated otherwise, and the player opens early.

Page generated 2026-09-03 from data published by the New Hampshire General Court. Granite Record is an independent project, not affiliated with the General Court. The official record always takes precedence. Corrections: [email protected]