All bills

CACR 28

relating to morality and piety. Providing that town, parishes, bodies corporate, or religious societies may elect and contract with teachers.

Filed 2026 · Killed · Education Policy and Administration · CACR

Official record at gencourt.state.nh.us ↗

Open this bill in the searchable view →  ·  Follow this bill by RSS

On the record

Quoted from the General Court bill status page, not worked out from the docket.

StatusHOUSE
In the HouseINEXPEDIENT TO LEGISLATE
Introduced1/7/2026
Floor date3/5/2026
LSR number3015
Local government impactno
Committee codeH62

Bill text (PDF) ↗

Where it stands

House: INEXPEDIENT TO LEGISLATE

Every floor vote on this bill was a voice or division vote, so there is no record of how individual legislators voted.

A bill goes on the consent calendar when the committee vote was unanimous or nearly so, and any members who dissented did not object to placing it there. It then passes without floor debate. Ten members may file a petition to pull a bill off the consent calendar and have it debated and voted on separately.

Sponsors

Soti, Julius(R) Rock 35, Potenza, Kelley(R) Straf 19, Sabourin dit Choinière, Matt(R) Rock 30, Sellers, John(R) Graf 10
Prime sponsor in bold. From the General Court sponsor file.

What happened

Every action recorded in the official docket, in order. Each line ends with the journal or calendar that recorded it; where we have the document, that citation links to it.

Votes

Roll call tallies and individual votes from the General Court roll call files. Presiding, excused and absent are shown separately: one member presides over each House roll call and does not vote except to break a tie.

Inexpedient to Legislate

March 5, 2026 · House · None–None, adopted

Decided on a voice vote. Only the outcome was recorded — there is no count of how any member voted.

Committee reports

Reproduced from the House Calendar in the committee’s own words.

Committee — INEXPEDIENT TO LEGISLATE

Rep. Mike Belcher

This constitutional amendment is brought with an eye towards correcting what is seen as an error in previous amending processes that, it is suggested, violated norms of informed consent in adoption and resulted in taxation authority being claimed by the state that was never affirmatively conferred by the people. While there is a level of sympathy for the problems espoused, the pursuit of this particular CACR does not seem to logically follow, as it is admitted that this amendment would take us back to very early language that would be in direct conflict with other constitutional provisions, thereby introducing perhaps larger problems than it aims to solve, not the least of which being the insertion of the state into the affairs of the church to the detriment of both. It is the opinion of the committee that, if a genuine problem can be identified for which resolution is necessary, and the solution is to be a CACR, the resolution ought to be pursued directly, not indirectly by attempting to revert to a prior state of affairs, and without introducing further readily identifiable problems. Vote 14-1.

Hearings and recordings

Recordings are the General Court’s own, on YouTube. Start times are estimates unless stated otherwise, and the player opens early.

Page generated 2026-09-03 from data published by the New Hampshire General Court. Granite Record is an independent project, not affiliated with the General Court. The official record always takes precedence. Corrections: [email protected]