CACR 3 (2025): relating to recall elections. Providing that the general court may authorize recall elections.

Cite this page

Granite Record indexes the General Court’s record; it is not that record. Where a citation allows only one source, cite the General Court — every page here links to what it is drawn from. The date below is the day the page was read.

MLA
“CACR 3 (2025): relating to recall elections. Providing that the general court may authorize recall elections.” Granite Record, https://graniterecord.org/bill/2025/cacr3. Accessed 19 Oct. 2026.
APA
Granite Record. (n.d.). CACR 3 (2025): relating to recall elections. Providing that the general court may authorize recall elections. Retrieved 19 Oct. 2026, from https://graniterecord.org/bill/2025/cacr3
Chicago
Granite Record. “CACR 3 (2025): relating to recall elections. Providing that the general court may authorize recall elections.” Accessed 19 Oct. 2026. https://graniterecord.org/bill/2025/cacr3.
BibTeX
@misc{bill-2025-cacr3, title = {CACR 3 (2025): relating to recall elections. Providing that the general court may authorize recall elections.}, howpublished = {Granite Record}, url = {https://graniterecord.org/bill/2025/cacr3}, note = {Accessed 19 Oct. 2026} }

CACR 3 (2025)

relating to recall elections. Providing that the general court may authorize recall elections.

  • Status: Killed
  • Term: 2025-2026
  • House committee: Election Law
  • Subject: Constitutional Amendments

The Story

It was introduced on January 8, 2025 and referred to the House Election Law committee. The committee held a public hearing on January 28, 2025, with 43 people signed in online: 10 in support and 33 in opposition. The committee met in executive session on February 4, 2025 to vote on its recommendation. The committee voted unanimously, 17–0, to recommend that the House kill it, and the report was placed on the consent calendar. On February 13, 2025 the House voted to kill it on a voice vote.

Sponsors

Hearings and Sessions

  • January 28, 2025, 2:20 PM: public hearing, House Election Law, LOB 306-308
  • February 4, 2025, 10:10 AM: executive session, House Election Law, LOB 306-308
  • February 13, 2025: consent calendar, House

Votes

  • February 13, 2025, House: Inexpedient to Legislate — voice vote, passed

The Docket

  • January 8, 2025: Introduced 01/08/2025 and referred to Election Law
  • January 28, 2025: Public Hearing: 01/28/2025 02:20 pm LOB 306-308
  • February 4, 2025: Executive Session: 02/04/2025 10:10 am LOB 306-308
  • February 4, 2025: Committee Report: Inexpedient to Legislate 02/04/2025 (Vote 17-0; CC)
  • February 13, 2025: Inexpedient to Legislate: MA VV 02/13/2025

Laws It Would Change

Related Bills

  • CACR 12 (2026): the adoption of tax laws.
  • CACR 33 (2022): relating to recall elections. Providing that the general court may authorize recall elections.
  • CACR 3 (2023): relating to recall elections. Providing that the general court may authorize recall elections.
  • CACR 16 (2020): relating to recall elections. Providing that the general court may authorize recall elections.
  • CACR 18 (2018): relating to recall elections. Providing that the general court may authorize recall elections.
  • CACR 2 (2013): Relating to taxation. Providing that taxes imposed by the state of New Hampshire or its subdivisions may be graduated.
  • CACR 22 (2010): relating to taxation. Providing that taxes imposed by the state of New Hampshire or its subdivisions may be graduated.
  • CACR 16 (2007): relating to an income and a sales tax. Providing that there shall be a state referendum prior to the legislature's adoption of an income tax or sales tax.
  • CACR 19 (2016): relating to the taking of human life. Providing that the general court shall not appropriate nor authorize any expenditure to benefit any corporation having as its object the taking of innocent human life.
  • CACR 35 (2002): relating to property taxation for education funding. Providing that if the state imposes a real property tax to fund public education, the state shall not collect, nor shall it require a political subdivision to collect or remit, such tax in excess of the amount contributed by the state to support the cost of adequate public education for pupils in such political subdivision.

From the General Court