HB 1592-FN (2022): allowing parties in family court cases to create their own recordings of the proceedings.

Cite this page

Granite Record indexes the General Court’s record; it is not that record. Where a citation allows only one source, cite the General Court — every page here links to what it is drawn from. The date below is the day the page was read.

MLA
“HB 1592-FN (2022): allowing parties in family court cases to create their own recordings of the proceedings.” Granite Record, https://graniterecord.org/bill/2022/hb1592. Accessed 24 Oct. 2026.
APA
Granite Record. (n.d.). HB 1592-FN (2022): allowing parties in family court cases to create their own recordings of the proceedings. Retrieved 24 Oct. 2026, from https://graniterecord.org/bill/2022/hb1592
Chicago
Granite Record. “HB 1592-FN (2022): allowing parties in family court cases to create their own recordings of the proceedings.” Accessed 24 Oct. 2026. https://graniterecord.org/bill/2022/hb1592.
BibTeX
@misc{bill-2022-hb1592, title = {HB 1592-FN (2022): allowing parties in family court cases to create their own recordings of the proceedings.}, howpublished = {Granite Record}, url = {https://graniterecord.org/bill/2022/hb1592}, note = {Accessed 24 Oct. 2026} }

HB 1592-FN (2022)

allowing parties in family court cases to create their own recordings of the proceedings.

  • Status: Killed
  • Term: 2021-2022
  • House committee: Judiciary
  • Senate committee: Judiciary
  • Subject: Domestic Relations

The Story

It was introduced on January 5, 2022 and referred to the House Judiciary committee. The committee held a public hearing on January 13, 2022. The committee met in executive session on January 13, 2022 to vote on its recommendation. The committee voted 19–1 to recommend that the House pass it with changes (amendment 2022-0474h), and the report was placed on the consent calendar. The committee's amendment (2022-0474h) was adopted on a voice vote on March 15, 2022, changing the text of the bill. On March 15, 2022 the House voted to pass it with changes on a voice vote. It crossed to the Senate on March 17, 2022 and was referred to the Senate Judiciary committee. The committee held a public hearing on April 5, 2022. The committee voted unanimously, 5–0, to recommend that the Senate kill it, and the report was placed on the consent calendar. On April 14, 2022 the Senate voted to kill it on a voice vote.

Sponsors

Hearings and Sessions

  • January 13, 2022, 10:45 AM: public hearing, House Judiciary, LOB 206-208
  • January 13, 2022, 10:45 AM: executive session, House Judiciary, LOB 206-208
  • April 5, 2022, 1:30 PM: hearing, Senate Judiciary, SH 100

Votes

  • March 15, 2022, House: Ought to Pass with Amendment 2022-0474h — voice vote, passed
  • April 14, 2022, Senate: Inexpedient to Legislate — voice vote, passed

The Docket

  • January 5, 2022: Introduced 01/05/2022 and referred to Judiciary
  • January 13, 2022: Public Hearing: 01/13/2022 10:45 am LOB 206-208
  • January 13, 2022: Executive Session: 01/13/2022 10:45 am LOB 206-208
  • March 4, 2022: Committee Report: Ought to Pass with Amendment #2022-0474h (Vote 19-1; CC)
  • March 15, 2022: Amendment #2022-0474h : AA VV 03/15/2022
  • March 15, 2022: Ought to Pass with Amendment 2022-0474h: MA VV 03/15/2022
  • March 17, 2022: Introduced 03/17/2022 and Referred to Judiciary
  • April 5, 2022: Hearing: 04/05/2022, Room 100, SH, 01:30 pm
  • April 14, 2022: Committee Report: Inexpedient to Legislate; Vote 5-0; CC; 04/14/2022
  • April 14, 2022: Inexpedient to Legislate, MA, VV ; 04/14/2022

Laws It Would Change

From the General Court