HB 561 (2021): relative to potential jurors excused from jury duty due to a lack of residency in the county of jury service.

Cite this page

Granite Record indexes the General Court’s record; it is not that record. Where a citation allows only one source, cite the General Court — every page here links to what it is drawn from. The date below is the day the page was read.

MLA
“HB 561 (2021): relative to potential jurors excused from jury duty due to a lack of residency in the county of jury service.” Granite Record, https://graniterecord.org/bill/2021/hb561. Accessed 24 Oct. 2026.
APA
Granite Record. (n.d.). HB 561 (2021): relative to potential jurors excused from jury duty due to a lack of residency in the county of jury service. Retrieved 24 Oct. 2026, from https://graniterecord.org/bill/2021/hb561
Chicago
Granite Record. “HB 561 (2021): relative to potential jurors excused from jury duty due to a lack of residency in the county of jury service.” Accessed 24 Oct. 2026. https://graniterecord.org/bill/2021/hb561.
BibTeX
@misc{bill-2021-hb561, title = {HB 561 (2021): relative to potential jurors excused from jury duty due to a lack of residency in the county of jury service.}, howpublished = {Granite Record}, url = {https://graniterecord.org/bill/2021/hb561}, note = {Accessed 24 Oct. 2026} }

HB 561 (2021)

relative to potential jurors excused from jury duty due to a lack of residency in the county of jury service.

  • Status: Died on the table
  • Term: 2021-2022
  • House committee: Judiciary
  • Subject: Miscellaneous

The Story

It was introduced on January 6, 2021 and referred to the House Judiciary committee. The committee met in executive session on March 10, 2021 to vote on its recommendation. The majority recommended that the House pass it, and the minority recommended that the House kill it, by a vote of 11–10. The report was placed on the regular calendar. On April 9, 2021 the House rejected a motion to pass it on a division vote 187–189. On April 9, 2021 the House voted to lay it on the table on a division vote 284–92, on a motion by Rep. Alexander Jr. The bill died on the table when the session ended on January 5, 2022, having been set aside and never taken back up.

Sponsors

Hearings and Sessions

  • February 23, 2021, 2:30 PM: public hearing, House Judiciary
  • March 10, 2021, 9:00 AM: executive session, House Judiciary

Votes

  • April 9, 2021, House: Ought to Pass — yeas 187, nays 189, failed
  • April 9, 2021, House: Lay on Table — yeas 284, nays 92, passed

The Docket

  • January 6, 2021: Introduced (in recess of) 01/06/2021 and referred to Judiciary
  • February 23, 2021: Public Hearing: 02/23/2021 02:30 pm Members of the public may attend using the following link: To join the webinar: https://www.zoom.us/j/91815905671 / Executive session on pending legislation may be held throughout the day (time permitting) from the time the committee is initially convened
  • March 2, 2021: ==CANCELLED== Executive Session: 03/02/2021 09:00 am Members of the public may attend using the following link: To join the webinar: https://www.zoom.us/j/95501229688
  • March 10, 2021: Executive Session: 03/10/2021 09:00 am Members of the public may attend using the following link: To join the webinar: https://www.zoom.us/j/95164452682
  • March 23, 2021: Majority Committee Report: Ought to Pass (Vote 11-10; RC)
  • March 23, 2021: Minority Committee Report: Inexpedient to Legislate
  • April 9, 2021: Ought to Pass: MF DV 187-189 04/09/2021
  • April 9, 2021: Lay on Table (Rep. Alexander Jr.): MA DV 284-92 04/09/2021
  • January 5, 2022: Died on Table, Session ended 01/05/2022

Laws It Would Change

From the General Court