CACR 11 (2021): relating to powers of the general court. Providing that the legislature have the power to submit a binding referendum on whether to overturn a decision of a state court that interprets a provision of the state constitution.

Cite this page

Granite Record indexes the General Court’s record; it is not that record. Where a citation allows only one source, cite the General Court — every page here links to what it is drawn from. The date below is the day the page was read.

MLA
“CACR 11 (2021): relating to powers of the general court. Providing that the legislature have the power to submit a binding referendum on whether to overturn a decision of a state court that interprets a provision of the state constitution.” Granite Record, https://graniterecord.org/bill/2021/cacr11. Accessed 24 Oct. 2026.
APA
Granite Record. (n.d.). CACR 11 (2021): relating to powers of the general court. Providing that the legislature have the power to submit a binding referendum on whether to overturn a decision of a state court that interprets a provision of the state constitution. Retrieved 24 Oct. 2026, from https://graniterecord.org/bill/2021/cacr11
Chicago
Granite Record. “CACR 11 (2021): relating to powers of the general court. Providing that the legislature have the power to submit a binding referendum on whether to overturn a decision of a state court that interprets a provision of the state constitution.” Accessed 24 Oct. 2026. https://graniterecord.org/bill/2021/cacr11.
BibTeX
@misc{bill-2021-cacr11, title = {CACR 11 (2021): relating to powers of the general court. Providing that the legislature have the power to submit a binding referendum on whether to overturn a decision of a state court that interprets a provision of the state constitution.}, howpublished = {Granite Record}, url = {https://graniterecord.org/bill/2021/cacr11}, note = {Accessed 24 Oct. 2026} }

CACR 11 (2021)

relating to powers of the general court. Providing that the legislature have the power to submit a binding referendum on whether to overturn a decision of a state court that interprets a provision of the state constitution.

  • Status: Killed
  • Term: 2021-2022
  • House committee: Legislative Administration
  • Subject: Constitutional Amendments

The Story

It was introduced on January 6, 2021 and referred to the House Legislative Administration committee. The committee voted unanimously, 15–0, to recommend that the House kill it, and the report was placed on the consent calendar. On April 7, 2021 the House voted to kill it on a voice vote. On April 7, 2021 the House failed “Reconsider” on a voice vote, on a motion by Rep. Jason Osborne.

Sponsors

Hearings and Sessions

  • February 22, 2021, 11:30 AM: public hearing, House Legislative Administration

Votes

  • April 7, 2021, House: Inexpedient to Legislate — voice vote, passed
  • April 7, 2021, House: Reconsider — voice vote, failed

The Docket

  • January 6, 2021: Introduced (in recess of) 01/06/2021 and referred to Legislative Administration
  • February 22, 2021: Public Hearing: 02/22/2021 11:30 am Members of the public may attend using the following link: To join the webinar: https://www.zoom.us/j/91906391213 / Executive session on pending legislation may be held throughout the day (time permitting) from the time the committee is initially convened
  • February 25, 2021: Committee Report: Inexpedient to Legislate (Vote 15-0; CC)
  • April 7, 2021: Inexpedient to Legislate: MA VV 04/07/2021
  • April 7, 2021: Reconsider (Rep. Osborne): MF VV 04/07/2021

Laws It Would Change

From the General Court