CACR 20 (2018): relating to the retirement age of judges. Providing that the retirement age of judges be increased.

Cite this page

Granite Record indexes the General Court’s record; it is not that record. Where a citation allows only one source, cite the General Court — every page here links to what it is drawn from. The date below is the day the page was read.

MLA
“CACR 20 (2018): relating to the retirement age of judges. Providing that the retirement age of judges be increased.” Granite Record, https://graniterecord.org/bill/2018/cacr20. Accessed 24 Oct. 2026.
APA
Granite Record. (n.d.). CACR 20 (2018): relating to the retirement age of judges. Providing that the retirement age of judges be increased. Retrieved 24 Oct. 2026, from https://graniterecord.org/bill/2018/cacr20
Chicago
Granite Record. “CACR 20 (2018): relating to the retirement age of judges. Providing that the retirement age of judges be increased.” Accessed 24 Oct. 2026. https://graniterecord.org/bill/2018/cacr20.
BibTeX
@misc{bill-2018-cacr20, title = {CACR 20 (2018): relating to the retirement age of judges. Providing that the retirement age of judges be increased.}, howpublished = {Granite Record}, url = {https://graniterecord.org/bill/2018/cacr20}, note = {Accessed 24 Oct. 2026} }

CACR 20 (2018)

relating to the retirement age of judges. Providing that the retirement age of judges be increased.

  • Status: Died on the table
  • Term: 2017-2018
  • Senate committee: Judiciary
  • Subject: Constitutional Amendments

The Story

It was introduced on January 3, 2018 and referred to the Senate Judiciary committee. The committee held a public hearing on January 9, 2018. The committee recommended that the Senate pass it. On January 18, 2018 the Senate rejected a motion to pass it. On January 18, 2018 the Senate rejected a motion to lay it on the table, on a motion by Sen. Bradley. On January 18, 2018 the Senate rejected a motion to kill it. On January 18, 2018 the Senate again rejected a motion to lay it on the table, on a motion by Sen. Bradley. On January 18, 2018 the Senate voted to lay it on the table, on a motion by Sen. Bradley.

Sponsors

Hearings and Sessions

  • January 9, 2018, 9:00 AM: hearing, Senate Judiciary, SH 100

Votes

  • January 18, 2018, Senate: Ought to Pass — yeas 13, nays 11, failed
  • January 18, 2018, Senate: Inexpedient to Legislate — yeas 11, nays 13, failed
  • January 18, 2018, Senate: Lay on Table — yeas 13, nays 11, passed

The Docket

  • January 3, 2018: To Be Introduced 01/03/2018 and Referred to Judiciary
  • January 9, 2018: Hearing: 01/09/2018, Room 100, SH, 09:00 am
  • January 18, 2018: Committee Report: Ought to Pass, 01/18/2018
  • January 18, 2018: Ought to Pass, RC 13Y-11N, MF, Lacking Necessary 3/5; 01/18/2018
  • January 18, 2018: Sen. Bradley Moved Laid on Table, DIV 8Y-15N, MF; 01/18/2018
  • January 18, 2018: Sen. Bradley Moved Inexpedient to Legislate; 01/18/2018
  • January 18, 2018: Inexpedient to Legislate, RC 11Y-13N, MF; 01/18/2018
  • January 18, 2018: Sen. Bradley Moved Laid on Table, DIV 10Y-14N, MF; 01/18/2018
  • January 18, 2018: Sen. Bradley Moved Laid on Table, RC 13Y-11N, MA; 01/18/2018
  • January 18, 2018: No Pending Motion; 01/18/2018

Laws It Would Change

From the General Court