CACR 6 (2017): relating to conflict of interest. Providing that no member of the general court shall sponsor, advocate for, nor vote on any legislation which would create a financial conflict of interest.

Cite this page

Granite Record indexes the General Court’s record; it is not that record. Where a citation allows only one source, cite the General Court — every page here links to what it is drawn from. The date below is the day the page was read.

MLA
“CACR 6 (2017): relating to conflict of interest. Providing that no member of the general court shall sponsor, advocate for, nor vote on any legislation which would create a financial conflict of interest.” Granite Record, https://graniterecord.org/bill/2017/cacr6. Accessed 24 Oct. 2026.
APA
Granite Record. (n.d.). CACR 6 (2017): relating to conflict of interest. Providing that no member of the general court shall sponsor, advocate for, nor vote on any legislation which would create a financial conflict of interest. Retrieved 24 Oct. 2026, from https://graniterecord.org/bill/2017/cacr6
Chicago
Granite Record. “CACR 6 (2017): relating to conflict of interest. Providing that no member of the general court shall sponsor, advocate for, nor vote on any legislation which would create a financial conflict of interest.” Accessed 24 Oct. 2026. https://graniterecord.org/bill/2017/cacr6.
BibTeX
@misc{bill-2017-cacr6, title = {CACR 6 (2017): relating to conflict of interest. Providing that no member of the general court shall sponsor, advocate for, nor vote on any legislation which would create a financial conflict of interest.}, howpublished = {Granite Record}, url = {https://graniterecord.org/bill/2017/cacr6}, note = {Accessed 24 Oct. 2026} }

CACR 6 (2017)

relating to conflict of interest. Providing that no member of the general court shall sponsor, advocate for, nor vote on any legislation which would create a financial conflict of interest.

  • Status: Killed
  • Term: 2017-2018
  • House committee: Legislative Administration
  • Subject: Constitutional Amendments

The Story

It was introduced on January 4, 2017 and referred to the House Legislative Administration committee. The committee held a public hearing on February 7, 2017. The committee met in executive session on February 28, 2017 to vote on its recommendation. The minority of the committee recommended that the House pass it. The majority of the committee recommended that the House kill it by a vote of 7–4, and the report was placed on the regular calendar. On March 9, 2017 the House voted to kill it on a roll call 208–153.

Sponsors

Hearings and Sessions

  • February 7, 2017, 11:15 AM: public hearing, House Legislative Administration, LOB 104
  • February 28, 2017, 10:00 AM: executive session, House Legislative Administration, LOB 104

Votes

  • March 9, 2017, House: Inexpedient to Legislate — yeas 208, nays 153, passed

The Docket

  • January 4, 2017: Introduced 01/04/2017 and referred to Legislative Administration
  • February 7, 2017: Public Hearing: 02/07/2017 11:15 AM LOB 104
  • February 28, 2017: Executive Session: 02/28/2017 10:00 AM LOB 104
  • March 1, 2017: Minority Committee Report: Ought to Pass
  • March 8, 2017: Majority Committee Report: Inexpedient to Legislate for 03/08/2017 (Vote 7-4; RC)
  • March 9, 2017: Inexpedient to Legislate: MA RC 208-153 03/09/2017

Laws It Would Change

From the General Court