HB 1117 (2016): establishing a child support maximum under the guidelines based on the parents' combined income.

Cite this page

Granite Record indexes the General Court’s record; it is not that record. Where a citation allows only one source, cite the General Court — every page here links to what it is drawn from. The date below is the day the page was read.

MLA
“HB 1117 (2016): establishing a child support maximum under the guidelines based on the parents' combined income.” Granite Record, https://graniterecord.org/bill/2016/hb1117. Accessed 24 Oct. 2026.
APA
Granite Record. (n.d.). HB 1117 (2016): establishing a child support maximum under the guidelines based on the parents' combined income. Retrieved 24 Oct. 2026, from https://graniterecord.org/bill/2016/hb1117
Chicago
Granite Record. “HB 1117 (2016): establishing a child support maximum under the guidelines based on the parents' combined income.” Accessed 24 Oct. 2026. https://graniterecord.org/bill/2016/hb1117.
BibTeX
@misc{bill-2016-hb1117, title = {HB 1117 (2016): establishing a child support maximum under the guidelines based on the parents' combined income.}, howpublished = {Granite Record}, url = {https://graniterecord.org/bill/2016/hb1117}, note = {Accessed 24 Oct. 2026} }

HB 1117 (2016)

establishing a child support maximum under the guidelines based on the parents' combined income.

  • Status: Killed
  • Term: 2015-2016
  • House committee: Children and Family Law
  • Senate committee: Judiciary
  • Subject: Domestic Relations

The Story

It was introduced on January 6, 2016 and referred to the House Children and Family Law committee. The committee held a public hearing on January 19, 2016. The committee met in executive session on February 2, 2016 to vote on its recommendation. The minority of the committee recommended that the House kill it. The majority of the committee recommended that the House pass it by a vote of 9–7, and the report was placed on the regular calendar. On March 10, 2016 the House voted to pass it on a division vote 177–128. It crossed to the Senate on March 17, 2016 and was referred to the Senate Judiciary committee. The committee held a public hearing on April 29, 2016. The committee recommended that the Senate kill it. On May 5, 2016 the Senate voted to kill it on a voice vote.

Sponsors

Hearings and Sessions

  • January 19, 2016, 10:00 AM: public hearing, House Children and Family Law, LOB206
  • February 2, 2016, 10:00 AM: executive session, House Children and Family Law, LOB 206
  • April 29, 2016, 1:15 PM: hearing, Senate Judiciary, SH 100

Votes

  • March 10, 2016, House: Ought to Pass — yeas 177, nays 128, passed
  • May 5, 2016, Senate: Inexpedient to Legislate — voice vote, passed

The Docket

  • January 6, 2016: Introduced 01/06/2016 and referred to Children and Family Law
  • January 19, 2016: Public Hearing: 01/19/2016 10:00 AM LOB206
  • February 2, 2016: Executive Session: 02/02/2016 10:00 AM LOB 206
  • February 18, 2016: Minority Committee Report: Inexpedient to Legislate
  • March 9, 2016: Majority Committee Report: Ought to Pass for 03/09/2016 (Vote 9-7; RC)
  • March 10, 2016: Ought to Pass : MA DV 177-128 03/10/2016
  • March 17, 2016: Introduced 03/17/2016 and Referred to Judiciary
  • April 29, 2016: Hearing: 04/29/2016, Room 100, SH, 01:15 pm
  • May 5, 2016: Committee Report: Inexpedient to Legislate, 05/05/2016
  • May 5, 2016: Inexpedient to Legislate, MA, VV ; 05/05/2016

Laws It Would Change

From the General Court