HB 465 (2014): repealing New Hampshire's atomic energy policy.

Cite this page

Granite Record indexes the General Court’s record; it is not that record. Where a citation allows only one source, cite the General Court — every page here links to what it is drawn from. The date below is the day the page was read.

MLA
“HB 465 (2014): repealing New Hampshire's atomic energy policy.” Granite Record, https://graniterecord.org/bill/2014/hb465. Accessed 24 Oct. 2026.
APA
Granite Record. (n.d.). HB 465 (2014): repealing New Hampshire's atomic energy policy. Retrieved 24 Oct. 2026, from https://graniterecord.org/bill/2014/hb465
Chicago
Granite Record. “HB 465 (2014): repealing New Hampshire's atomic energy policy.” Accessed 24 Oct. 2026. https://graniterecord.org/bill/2014/hb465.
BibTeX
@misc{bill-2014-hb465, title = {HB 465 (2014): repealing New Hampshire's atomic energy policy.}, howpublished = {Granite Record}, url = {https://graniterecord.org/bill/2014/hb465}, note = {Accessed 24 Oct. 2026} }

HB 465 (2014)

repealing New Hampshire's atomic energy policy.

  • Status: Referred for interim study
  • Term: 2013-2014
  • House committee: Science, Technology and Energy
  • Subject: Energy and Utilities

The Story

It was introduced on January 3, 2013 and referred to the House Science, Technology and Energy committee. The committee held a public hearing on February 14, 2013. The committee met in executive session on February 26, 2013 to vote on its recommendation. The committee voted 13–3 to recommend that the House pass it. On March 20, 2013 the House adopted “Recommit (Rep Borden)” on a voice vote. The committee met in executive session on March 20, 2013 to vote on its recommendation. The committee retained the bill, holding it for further work rather than reporting it out this year. The committee met in executive session on November 12, 2013 to vote on its recommendation. The committee reported: Refer to Interim Study for Jan 8 unanimously, 18–0. On January 8, 2014 the House adopted “Refer to Interim Study” on a voice vote. The committee held a work session on June 10, 2014. The committee met in executive session on October 21, 2014 to vote on its recommendation. The committee reported back on its interim study of the bill: “Recommended For Future Legislation”, by a vote of 10 to 2.

Sponsors

Hearings and Sessions

  • February 14, 2013, 1:00 PM: public hearing, House Science, Technology and Energy, LOB 304
  • February 26, 2013, 1:00 PM: executive session, House Science, Technology and Energy, LOB 304
  • March 20, 2013, 5:30 PM: executive session, House Science, Technology and Energy, LOB 304
  • November 12, 2013, 10:00 AM: executive session, House Science, Technology and Energy, LOB 304
  • June 10, 2014, 3:00 PM: full committee work session, House Science, Technology and Energy, LOB 302-304
  • October 21, 2014, 1:00 PM: executive session, House Science, Technology and Energy, LOB 304

Votes

  • March 20, 2013, House: Recommit (Rep Borden) — voice vote, passed
  • January 8, 2014, House: Refer to Interim Study — voice vote, passed

The Docket

  • January 3, 2013: Introduced 1/3/2013 and Referred to Science, Technology and Energy
  • February 14, 2013: Public Hearing: 2/14/2013 1:00 PM LOB 304
  • February 26, 2013: Executive Session: 2/26/2013 1:00 PM LOB 304
  • February 27, 2013: Committee Report: Ought to Pass for Mar 20 (Vote 13-3; Part I, RC)
  • March 13, 2013: Special Ordered to Next Session Without Objection
  • March 20, 2013: Recommit (Rep Borden): MA VV
  • March 20, 2013: Executive Session: 3/20/2013 5:30 PM LOB 304
  • March 21, 2013: Retained in Committee
  • November 12, 2013: Retained Bill-Executive Session: 11/12/2013 10:00 AM LOB 304
  • November 25, 2013: Committee Report: Refer to Interim Study for Jan 8 (Vote 18-0; CC)
  • January 8, 2014: Refer to Interim Study MA VV
  • June 10, 2014: Interim Study - Full Committee Work Session: 6/10/2014 3:00 PM LOB 302-304
  • October 21, 2014: Executive Session: 10/21/2014 1:00 PM LOB 304
  • October 31, 2014: Interim Study Report: Recommended For Future Legislation (Vote 10-2)

Laws It Would Change

From the General Court