SB 264 (2012): relative to energy facility site evaluations.

Cite this page

Granite Record indexes the General Court’s record; it is not that record. Where a citation allows only one source, cite the General Court — every page here links to what it is drawn from. The date below is the day the page was read.

MLA
“SB 264 (2012): relative to energy facility site evaluations.” Granite Record, https://graniterecord.org/bill/2012/sb264. Accessed 24 Oct. 2026.
APA
Granite Record. (n.d.). SB 264 (2012): relative to energy facility site evaluations. Retrieved 24 Oct. 2026, from https://graniterecord.org/bill/2012/sb264
Chicago
Granite Record. “SB 264 (2012): relative to energy facility site evaluations.” Accessed 24 Oct. 2026. https://graniterecord.org/bill/2012/sb264.
BibTeX
@misc{bill-2012-sb264, title = {SB 264 (2012): relative to energy facility site evaluations.}, howpublished = {Granite Record}, url = {https://graniterecord.org/bill/2012/sb264}, note = {Accessed 24 Oct. 2026} }

SB 264 (2012)

relative to energy facility site evaluations.

  • Status: Killed
  • Term: 2011-2012
  • Senate committee: Energy and Natural Resources
  • Subject: Energy and Utilities

The Story

It was introduced on January 4, 2012 and referred to the Senate Energy and Natural Resources committee. The committee held a public hearing on March 15, 2012. The committee voted unanimously, 5–0, to recommend that the Senate kill it, and the report was placed on the consent calendar. On March 21, 2012 the Senate voted to kill it on a voice vote.

Sponsors

Hearings and Sessions

  • March 15, 2012, 10:00 AM: hearing, Senate Energy and Natural Resources, LOB 102

Votes

  • March 21, 2012, Senate: Inexpedient to Legislate — voice vote, passed

The Docket

  • January 4, 2012: Introduced 1/4/2012 and Referred to Energy and Natural Resources
  • March 15, 2012: Hearing: 3/15/12, Room 102, LOB, 10:00 a.m.; SC10
  • March 15, 2012: Committee Report: Inexpedient to Legislate, 3/21/12; Vote 5-0; CC; SC11
  • March 21, 2012: Inexpedient to Legislate, MA, VV

Laws It Would Change

From the General Court