HB 520-FN (2012): requiring certain bills to have performance standard notes.

Cite this page

Granite Record indexes the General Court’s record; it is not that record. Where a citation allows only one source, cite the General Court — every page here links to what it is drawn from. The date below is the day the page was read.

MLA
“HB 520-FN (2012): requiring certain bills to have performance standard notes.” Granite Record, https://graniterecord.org/bill/2012/hb520. Accessed 24 Oct. 2026.
APA
Granite Record. (n.d.). HB 520-FN (2012): requiring certain bills to have performance standard notes. Retrieved 24 Oct. 2026, from https://graniterecord.org/bill/2012/hb520
Chicago
Granite Record. “HB 520-FN (2012): requiring certain bills to have performance standard notes.” Accessed 24 Oct. 2026. https://graniterecord.org/bill/2012/hb520.
BibTeX
@misc{bill-2012-hb520, title = {HB 520-FN (2012): requiring certain bills to have performance standard notes.}, howpublished = {Granite Record}, url = {https://graniterecord.org/bill/2012/hb520}, note = {Accessed 24 Oct. 2026} }

HB 520-FN (2012)

requiring certain bills to have performance standard notes.

  • Status: Referred for interim study
  • Term: 2011-2012
  • House committee: Legislative Administration
  • Senate committee: Finance
  • Subject: Legislature

The Story

It was introduced on January 6, 2011 and referred to the House Legislative Administration committee. The committee held a public hearing on February 22, 2011. The committee held a work session on February 24, 2011. The committee met in executive session on March 1, 2011 to vote on its recommendation. The committee voted 12–1 to recommend that the House pass it, and the report was placed on the consent calendar. On March 15, 2011 the House voted to pass it on a voice vote. It crossed to the Senate on April 20, 2011 and was referred to the Senate Finance committee. The committee held a public hearing on May 5, 2011. The committee recommended that the Senate send it back to committee. On May 25, 2011 the Senate voted to send it back to committee on a voice vote. The committee recommended that the Senate study it after the session ends. On January 18, 2012 the Senate adopted “Refer to Interim Study” on a voice vote.

Sponsors

Hearings and Sessions

  • February 22, 2011, 10:30 AM: public hearing, House Legislative Administration, LOB 104
  • February 24, 2011, 3:00 PM: subcommittee work session, House Legislative Administration, LOB 104
  • March 1, 2011, 10:00 AM: executive session, House Legislative Administration, LOB 104
  • May 5, 2011, 1:00 PM: hearing, Senate Finance, SH 103

Votes

  • March 15, 2011, House: Ought to Pass — voice vote, passed
  • May 25, 2011, Senate: Rereferred to Committee — voice vote, passed
  • January 18, 2012, Senate: Refer to Interim Study — voice vote, passed

The Docket

  • January 6, 2011: Introduced 1/6/2011 and Referred to Legislative Administration
  • February 22, 2011: Public Hearing: 2/22/2011 10:30 AM LOB 104
  • February 24, 2011: Subcommittee Work Session: 2/24/2011 3:00 PM LOB 104
  • March 1, 2011: Executive Session: 3/1/2011 10:00 AM LOB 104
  • March 1, 2011: Committee Report: Ought to Pass for Mar 15 (Vote 12-1; CC)
  • March 15, 2011: Ought to Pass: MA VV
  • April 20, 2011: Introduced and Referred to Finance
  • May 5, 2011: Hearing: 5/5/11, Room 103, State House, 1:00 p.m.; SC22
  • May 19, 2011: Committee Report: Rereferred to Committee, 5/25/11; SC25
  • May 25, 2011: Rereferred to Committee, MA, VV
  • January 12, 2012: Committee Report: Referred to Interim Study, 1/18/12; SC3
  • January 18, 2012: Refer to Interim Study, MA, VV

Laws It Would Change

From the General Court