HB 1267 (2012): relative to adjustments to the child support guidelines based on child support expenses documented by the parties.

Cite this page

Granite Record indexes the General Court’s record; it is not that record. Where a citation allows only one source, cite the General Court — every page here links to what it is drawn from. The date below is the day the page was read.

MLA
“HB 1267 (2012): relative to adjustments to the child support guidelines based on child support expenses documented by the parties.” Granite Record, https://graniterecord.org/bill/2012/hb1267. Accessed 24 Oct. 2026.
APA
Granite Record. (n.d.). HB 1267 (2012): relative to adjustments to the child support guidelines based on child support expenses documented by the parties. Retrieved 24 Oct. 2026, from https://graniterecord.org/bill/2012/hb1267
Chicago
Granite Record. “HB 1267 (2012): relative to adjustments to the child support guidelines based on child support expenses documented by the parties.” Accessed 24 Oct. 2026. https://graniterecord.org/bill/2012/hb1267.
BibTeX
@misc{bill-2012-hb1267, title = {HB 1267 (2012): relative to adjustments to the child support guidelines based on child support expenses documented by the parties.}, howpublished = {Granite Record}, url = {https://graniterecord.org/bill/2012/hb1267}, note = {Accessed 24 Oct. 2026} }

HB 1267 (2012)

relative to adjustments to the child support guidelines based on child support expenses documented by the parties.

  • Status: Killed
  • Term: 2011-2012
  • House committee: Children and Family Law
  • Subject: Domestic Relations

The Story

It was introduced on January 4, 2012 and referred to the House Children and Family Law committee. The committee held a public hearing on January 17, 2012. The committee met in executive session on February 9, 2012 to vote on its recommendation. The committee held work sessions on February 10, 2012 and February 17, 2012. The committee met in executive session on February 23, 2012 to vote on its recommendation. The committee voted unanimously, 14–0, to recommend that the House kill it, and the report was placed on the consent calendar. The bill was taken off the consent calendar on March 7, 2012. On March 15, 2012 the House voted to kill it on a voice vote. On March 21, 2012 the House adopted “Special Order (Reconsideration Motion) to Next Session Day (Rep Jasper)” on a voice vote. On March 28, 2012 the House failed “Reconsideration (Rep DeLemus)” on a division vote 103–233.

Sponsors

Hearings and Sessions

  • January 17, 2012, 2:30 PM: public hearing, House Children and Family Law, LOB 206
  • February 9, 2012, 10:30 AM: executive session, House Children and Family Law, LOB 206
  • February 10, 2012, 1:30 PM: subcommittee work session, House Children and Family Law, LOB 206
  • February 17, 2012, 1:30 PM: subcommittee work session, House Children and Family Law, LOB 206
  • February 23, 2012, 9:00 AM: executive session, House Children and Family Law, LOB 206

Votes

  • March 15, 2012, House: Inexpedient to Legislate — voice vote, passed
  • March 21, 2012, House: Special Order (Reconsideration Motion) to Next Session Day (Rep Jasper) — voice vote, passed
  • March 28, 2012, House: Reconsideration (Rep DeLemus) — yeas 103, nays 233, failed

The Docket

  • January 4, 2012: Introduced 1/4/2012 and Referred to Children and Family Law
  • January 17, 2012: Public Hearing: 1/17/2012 2:30 PM LOB 206
  • February 9, 2012: Executive Session: 2/9/2012 10:30 AM LOB 206
  • February 10, 2012: Subcommittee Work Session: 2/10/2012 1:30 PM LOB 206
  • February 17, 2012: Subcommittee Work Session: 2/17/2012 1:30 PM LOB 206
  • February 23, 2012: Executive Session: 2/23/2012 9:00 AM LOB 206
  • February 23, 2012: Committee Report: Inexpedient to Legislate for Mar 7 (Vote 14-0; CC)
  • March 7, 2012: Removed from Consent Calendar (Rep Oligny)
  • March 15, 2012: Inexpedient to Legislate: MA VV
  • March 21, 2012: Special Order (Reconsideration Motion) to Next Session Day (Rep Jasper): MA VV
  • March 28, 2012: Reconsideration (Rep DeLemus): MF DIV 103-233

Laws It Would Change

From the General Court