CACR 24 (2012): Relating to age limitations for judges. Providing that no person shall be eligible to be appointed a judge until such person has reached 60 years of age.

Cite this page

Granite Record indexes the General Court’s record; it is not that record. Where a citation allows only one source, cite the General Court — every page here links to what it is drawn from. The date below is the day the page was read.

MLA
“CACR 24 (2012): Relating to age limitations for judges. Providing that no person shall be eligible to be appointed a judge until such person has reached 60 years of age.” Granite Record, https://graniterecord.org/bill/2012/cacr24. Accessed 24 Oct. 2026.
APA
Granite Record. (n.d.). CACR 24 (2012): Relating to age limitations for judges. Providing that no person shall be eligible to be appointed a judge until such person has reached 60 years of age. Retrieved 24 Oct. 2026, from https://graniterecord.org/bill/2012/cacr24
Chicago
Granite Record. “CACR 24 (2012): Relating to age limitations for judges. Providing that no person shall be eligible to be appointed a judge until such person has reached 60 years of age.” Accessed 24 Oct. 2026. https://graniterecord.org/bill/2012/cacr24.
BibTeX
@misc{bill-2012-cacr24, title = {CACR 24 (2012): Relating to age limitations for judges. Providing that no person shall be eligible to be appointed a judge until such person has reached 60 years of age.}, howpublished = {Granite Record}, url = {https://graniterecord.org/bill/2012/cacr24}, note = {Accessed 24 Oct. 2026} }

CACR 24 (2012)

Relating to age limitations for judges. Providing that no person shall be eligible to be appointed a judge until such person has reached 60 years of age.

  • Status: Killed
  • Term: 2011-2012
  • House committee: Judiciary
  • Subject: Constitutional Amendments

The Story

It was introduced on January 4, 2012 and referred to the House Judiciary committee. The committee held a public hearing on January 10, 2012. The committee met in executive session on January 19, 2012 to vote on its recommendation. The committee voted unanimously, 15–0, to recommend that the House kill it, and the report was placed on the consent calendar. On February 1, 2012 the House voted to kill it on a voice vote.

Sponsors

Hearings and Sessions

  • January 10, 2012, 9:00 AM: public hearing, House Judiciary, LOB 208
  • January 19, 2012, 9:30 AM: executive session, House Judiciary, LOB 208

Votes

  • February 1, 2012, House: Inexpedient to Legislate — voice vote, passed

The Docket

  • January 4, 2012: Introduced 1/4/2012 and Referred to Judiciary
  • January 10, 2012: Public Hearing: 1/10/2012 9:00 AM LOB 208
  • January 19, 2012: Executive Session: 1/19/2012 9:30 AM LOB 208
  • January 25, 2012: Committee Report: Inexpedient to Legislate for Feb 1 (Vote 15-0; CC)
  • February 1, 2012: Inexpedient to Legislate: MA VV

Laws It Would Change

From the General Court