HB 569-FN (2011): establishing domestic union as a valid contract and extending certain rights to parties to a domestic union.
Cite this page
Granite Record indexes the General Court’s record; it is not that record. Where a citation allows only one source, cite the General Court — every page here links to what it is drawn from. The date below is the day the page was read.
- MLA
- “HB 569-FN (2011): establishing domestic union as a valid contract and extending certain rights to parties to a domestic union.” Granite Record, https://graniterecord.org/bill/2011/hb569. Accessed 24 Oct. 2026.
- APA
- Granite Record. (n.d.). HB 569-FN (2011): establishing domestic union as a valid contract and extending certain rights to parties to a domestic union. Retrieved 24 Oct. 2026, from https://graniterecord.org/bill/2011/hb569
- Chicago
- Granite Record. “HB 569-FN (2011): establishing domestic union as a valid contract and extending certain rights to parties to a domestic union.” Accessed 24 Oct. 2026. https://graniterecord.org/bill/2011/hb569.
- BibTeX
@misc{bill-2011-hb569, title = {HB 569-FN (2011): establishing domestic union as a valid contract and extending certain rights to parties to a domestic union.}, howpublished = {Granite Record}, url = {https://graniterecord.org/bill/2011/hb569}, note = {Accessed 24 Oct. 2026} }
HB 569-FN (2011)
establishing domestic union as a valid contract and extending certain rights to parties to a domestic union.
- Status: Killed
- Term: 2011-2012
- House committee: Judiciary
- Subject: Miscellaneous
The Story
It was introduced on January 6, 2011 and referred to the House Judiciary committee. The committee held a public hearing on February 17, 2011. The committee met in executive session on March 9, 2011 to vote on its recommendation. The committee voted unanimously, 16–0, to recommend that the House kill it, and the report was placed on the consent calendar. The bill was taken off the consent calendar on March 15, 2011. On March 17, 2011 the House failed “Lay on the Table (Rep Bolster)” on a division vote 74–186. On March 17, 2011 the House voted to kill it on a roll call 232–59.
Sponsors
- Rep. Peter Bolster (R - Belk 5) (prime sponsor)
- Rep. Seth Cohn (R - Merr 6)
- Rep. Timothy Comerford (R - Rock 9)
- Rep. James Waddell (R - Rock 15)
- Rep. George Lambert (R - Hills 27)
- Rep. Calvin Pratt (R - Hills 7)
- Rep. Richard Drisko (R - Hills 5)
- Rep. J. Michael Ball (R - Hills 9)
- Rep. Chris Christensen (R - Hills 19)
Hearings and Sessions
- February 17, 2011, 10:30 AM: public hearing, House Judiciary, Representative's Hall
- March 9, 2011, 10:00 AM: executive session, House Judiciary, LOB 208
Votes
- March 17, 2011, House: Lay on the Table (Rep Bolster) — yeas 74, nays 186, failed
- March 17, 2011, House: Inexpedient to Legislate — yeas 232, nays 59, passed
The Docket
- January 6, 2011: Introduced 1/6/2011 and Referred to Judiciary
- February 17, 2011: Public Hearing: 2/17/2011 10:30 AM Representative's Hall
- March 1, 2011: ==CANCELLED== Executive Session: 3/1/2011 1:00 PM LOB 208 (If Necessary Continued 3/3/2011 10:00 AM LOB 208)
- March 9, 2011: Executive Session: 3/9/2011 10:00 AM LOB 208
- March 9, 2011: Committee Report: Inexpedient to Legislate for Mar 15 (Vote 16-0; CC)
- March 15, 2011: Removed from Consent Calendar (Rep Cohn)
- March 17, 2011: Lay on the Table (Rep Bolster): MF DIV 74-186
- March 17, 2011: Inexpedient to Legislate: MA RC 232-59
Laws It Would Change
- RSA 457
- RSA 457:4
- RSA 457:5
- RSA 457:6
- RSA 457:7
- RSA 457:8
- RSA 457:38
- RSA 457:39
- RSA 457:40
- RSA 457:41
- RSA 457:42
- RSA 457:43
- RSA 457:44
- RSA 457:45
- RSA 457:1
- RSA 457:22-29
- RSA 457:31-37
- RSA 457:46