HB 677-FN (2010): allowing part-time district court justices and probate court judges to sit as senior active status judges upon retirement.

Cite this page

Granite Record indexes the General Court’s record; it is not that record. Where a citation allows only one source, cite the General Court — every page here links to what it is drawn from. The date below is the day the page was read.

MLA
“HB 677-FN (2010): allowing part-time district court justices and probate court judges to sit as senior active status judges upon retirement.” Granite Record, https://graniterecord.org/bill/2010/hb677. Accessed 24 Oct. 2026.
APA
Granite Record. (n.d.). HB 677-FN (2010): allowing part-time district court justices and probate court judges to sit as senior active status judges upon retirement. Retrieved 24 Oct. 2026, from https://graniterecord.org/bill/2010/hb677
Chicago
Granite Record. “HB 677-FN (2010): allowing part-time district court justices and probate court judges to sit as senior active status judges upon retirement.” Accessed 24 Oct. 2026. https://graniterecord.org/bill/2010/hb677.
BibTeX
@misc{bill-2010-hb677, title = {HB 677-FN (2010): allowing part-time district court justices and probate court judges to sit as senior active status judges upon retirement.}, howpublished = {Granite Record}, url = {https://graniterecord.org/bill/2010/hb677}, note = {Accessed 24 Oct. 2026} }

HB 677-FN (2010)

allowing part-time district court justices and probate court judges to sit as senior active status judges upon retirement.

  • Status: Killed
  • Term: 2009-2010
  • House committee: Judiciary
  • Subject: Miscellaneous

The Story

It was introduced on January 8, 2009 and referred to the House Judiciary committee. The committee held a public hearing on February 11, 2009. The committee met in executive session on March 5, 2009 to vote on its recommendation. The committee retained the bill, holding it for further work rather than reporting it out this year. The committee held a work session on October 20, 2009. The committee met in executive session on November 17, 2009 to vote on its recommendation. The committee voted unanimously, 19–0, to recommend that the House kill it. On January 6, 2010 the House voted to kill it on a voice vote.

Sponsors

Hearings and Sessions

  • February 11, 2009, 11:00 AM: public hearing, House Judiciary, LOB 208
  • March 5, 2009, 11:00 AM: executive session, House Judiciary, LOB 208
  • October 20, 2009, 11:30 AM: subcommittee work session, House Judiciary, LOB 208
  • November 17, 2009, 10:00 AM: executive session, House Judiciary, LOB 208

Votes

  • January 6, 2010, House: Inexpedient to Legislate — voice vote, passed

The Docket

  • January 8, 2009: Introduced and Referred to Judiciary
  • February 11, 2009: Public Hearing: 2/11/2009 11:00 AM LOB 208
  • March 5, 2009: Executive Session: 3/5/2009 11:00 AM LOB 208 (Continued 3/12/09 10:00 AM LOB 208 If Needed)
  • March 6, 2009: Retained in Committee
  • October 20, 2009: Retained Bill - Subcommittee Work Session: 10/20/2009 11:30 AM LOB 208
  • November 17, 2009: Retained Bill - Executive Session: 11/17/2009 10:00 AM LOB 208
  • November 20, 2009: Committee Report: Inexpedient to Legislate for Jan 6 CC (vote 19-0)
  • January 6, 2010: Inexpedient to Legislate: MA VV

Laws It Would Change

From the General Court