HB 609-FN-A (2010): establishing a judicial branch information technology fund.

Cite this page

Granite Record indexes the General Court’s record; it is not that record. Where a citation allows only one source, cite the General Court — every page here links to what it is drawn from. The date below is the day the page was read.

MLA
“HB 609-FN-A (2010): establishing a judicial branch information technology fund.” Granite Record, https://graniterecord.org/bill/2010/hb609. Accessed 24 Oct. 2026.
APA
Granite Record. (n.d.). HB 609-FN-A (2010): establishing a judicial branch information technology fund. Retrieved 24 Oct. 2026, from https://graniterecord.org/bill/2010/hb609
Chicago
Granite Record. “HB 609-FN-A (2010): establishing a judicial branch information technology fund.” Accessed 24 Oct. 2026. https://graniterecord.org/bill/2010/hb609.
BibTeX
@misc{bill-2010-hb609, title = {HB 609-FN-A (2010): establishing a judicial branch information technology fund.}, howpublished = {Granite Record}, url = {https://graniterecord.org/bill/2010/hb609}, note = {Accessed 24 Oct. 2026} }

HB 609-FN-A (2010)

establishing a judicial branch information technology fund.

  • Status: Killed
  • Term: 2009-2010
  • House committee: Judiciary
  • Subject: Courts and Procedure

The Story

It was introduced on January 8, 2009 and referred to the House Judiciary committee. The committee held a public hearing on February 4, 2009. The committee met in executive session on February 17, 2009 to vote on its recommendation. The committee voted 16–1 to recommend that the House pass it. On March 4, 2009 the House voted to pass it on a voice vote. On March 4, 2009 the bill was referred to the Ways and Means committee. The committee held work sessions on March 20, 2009 and March 23, 2009. The committee met in executive session on March 31, 2009 to vote on its recommendation. The committee retained the bill, holding it for further work rather than reporting it out this year. The committee met in executive session on October 28, 2009 to vote on its recommendation. The committee voted unanimously, 19–0, to recommend that the House kill it. On January 6, 2010 the House voted to kill it on a voice vote.

Sponsors

Hearings and Sessions

  • February 4, 2009, 1:30 PM: public hearing, House Judiciary, LOB 208
  • February 17, 2009, 10:00 AM: executive session, House Judiciary, LOB 208
  • March 20, 2009, 1:00 PM: full committee work session, House Ways and Means, LOB 202
  • March 23, 2009, 10:00 AM: full committee work session, House Ways and Means, LOB 202
  • March 31, 2009, 9:30 AM: executive session, House Ways and Means, LOB 202
  • October 28, 2009: executive session, House Ways and Means

Votes

  • March 4, 2009, House: Ought to Pass — voice vote, passed
  • January 6, 2010, House: Inexpedient to Legislate — voice vote, passed

The Docket

  • January 8, 2009: Introduced and Referred to Judiciary
  • February 4, 2009: Public Hearing: 2/4/2009 1:30 PM LOB 208
  • February 10, 2009: ===CANCELLED=== Public Hearing: 2/10/2009 10:30 AM LOB 208
  • February 17, 2009: Executive Session: 2/17/2009 10:00 AM LOB 208
  • February 18, 2009: Committee Report: Ought to Pass for Mar 4 CC (vote 16-1)
  • March 4, 2009: Ought to Pass: MA VV
  • March 4, 2009: Referred to Ways and Means
  • March 20, 2009: Full Committee Work Session: 3/20/2009 1:00 PM LOB 202
  • March 23, 2009: Full Committee Work Session: 3/23/2009 10:00 AM LOB 202
  • March 31, 2009: Executive Session: 3/31/2009 9:30 AM LOB 202
  • April 1, 2009: Retained in Committee
  • October 28, 2009: Retained Bill - Executive Session: 10/28/2009 LOB 202 1:30 PM or Immediately Following Session
  • November 5, 2009: Committee Report: Inexpedient to Legislate for Jan 6 CC (vote 19-0)
  • January 6, 2010: Inexpedient to Legislate: MA VV

Laws It Would Change

From the General Court