HB 1248 (2010): prohibiting the state from doing business with any banking institution that requires fingerprints or bodily fluids from any person in order to complete a banking transaction.

Cite this page

Granite Record indexes the General Court’s record; it is not that record. Where a citation allows only one source, cite the General Court — every page here links to what it is drawn from. The date below is the day the page was read.

MLA: “HB 1248 (2010): prohibiting the state from doing business with any banking institution that requires fingerprints or bodily fluids from any person in order to complete a banking transaction.” Granite Record, https://graniterecord.org/bill/2010/hb1248. Accessed 24 Oct. 2026.
APA: Granite Record. (n.d.). HB 1248 (2010): prohibiting the state from doing business with any banking institution that requires fingerprints or bodily fluids from any person in order to complete a banking transaction. Retrieved 24 Oct. 2026, from https://graniterecord.org/bill/2010/hb1248
Chicago: Granite Record. “HB 1248 (2010): prohibiting the state from doing business with any banking institution that requires fingerprints or bodily fluids from any person in order to complete a banking transaction.” Accessed 24 Oct. 2026. https://graniterecord.org/bill/2010/hb1248.
BibTeX: @misc{bill-2010-hb1248, title = {HB 1248 (2010): prohibiting the state from doing business with any banking institution that requires fingerprints or bodily fluids from any person in order to complete a banking transaction.}, howpublished = {Granite Record}, url = {https://graniterecord.org/bill/2010/hb1248}, note = {Accessed 24 Oct. 2026} }

HB 1248 (2010)

prohibiting the state from doing business with any banking institution that requires fingerprints or bodily fluids from any person in order to complete a banking transaction.

Status: Killed
Term: 2009-2010
House committee: Commerce and Consumer Affairs
Subject: Miscellaneous

The Story

It was introduced on January 6, 2010 and referred to the House Commerce and Consumer Affairs committee. The committee held a public hearing on January 14, 2010. The committee held a work session on January 27, 2010. The committee met in executive session on February 4, 2010 to vote on its recommendation. The majority recommended that the House kill it, and the minority recommended that the House pass it with changes (amendment 0594h), by a vote of 11–6. The report was placed on the regular calendar. On March 17, 2010 the House adopted “Special Order to Regular Place in Mar 18 Calendar (Rep Kurk)” on a division vote 243–49. On March 18, 2010 the House voted to kill it on a division vote 207–77.

Hearings and Sessions

January 14, 2010, 9:30 AM: public hearing, House Commerce and Consumer Affairs, LOB 302
January 27, 2010, 10:30 AM: subcommittee work session, House Commerce and Consumer Affairs, LOB 302
February 4, 2010, 10:00 AM: executive session, House Commerce and Consumer Affairs, LOB 302

Votes

March 17, 2010, House: Special Order to Regular Place in Mar 18 Calendar (Rep Kurk) — yeas 243, nays 49, passed
March 18, 2010, House: Inexpedient to Legislate — yeas 207, nays 77, passed

The Docket

January 6, 2010: Introduced and Referred to Commerce and Consumer Affairs
January 14, 2010: Public Hearing: 1/14/2010 9:30 AM LOB 302
January 27, 2010: Subcommittee Work Session: 1/27/2010 10:30 AM LOB 302 (Members: Reps DeStefano, Palfrey & Keans)
February 4, 2010: Executive Session: 2/4/2010 10:00 AM LOB 302
February 10, 2010: Majority Committee Report: Inexpedient to Legislate for Mar 17 (vote 11-6; RC)
February 10, 2010: Minority Committee Report: Ought to Pass with Amendment #0594h (New Title)
February 10, 2010: Proposed Minority Committee Amendment #0594h (New Title)
March 17, 2010: Special Order to Regular Place in Mar 18 Calendar (Rep Kurk): MA DIV 243-49
March 18, 2010: Inexpedient to Legislate: MA DIV 207-77

Laws It Would Change

RSA 6