CACR 10 (2009): relating to: electoral districts. Providing that: representative districts be apportioned within senate districts and that senate districts be apportioned within executive council districts and giving county boundaries priority in senate district apportionment.
Cite this page
Granite Record indexes the General Court’s record; it is not that record. Where a citation allows only one source, cite the General Court — every page here links to what it is drawn from. The date below is the day the page was read.
- MLA
- “CACR 10 (2009): relating to: electoral districts. Providing that: representative districts be apportioned within senate districts and that senate districts be apportioned within executive council districts and giving county boundaries priority in senate district apportionment.” Granite Record, https://graniterecord.org/bill/2009/cacr10. Accessed 24 Oct. 2026.
- APA
- Granite Record. (n.d.). CACR 10 (2009): relating to: electoral districts. Providing that: representative districts be apportioned within senate districts and that senate districts be apportioned within executive council districts and giving county boundaries priority in senate district apportionment. Retrieved 24 Oct. 2026, from https://graniterecord.org/bill/2009/cacr10
- Chicago
- Granite Record. “CACR 10 (2009): relating to: electoral districts. Providing that: representative districts be apportioned within senate districts and that senate districts be apportioned within executive council districts and giving county boundaries priority in senate district apportionment.” Accessed 24 Oct. 2026. https://graniterecord.org/bill/2009/cacr10.
- BibTeX
@misc{bill-2009-cacr10, title = {CACR 10 (2009): relating to: electoral districts. Providing that: representative districts be apportioned within senate districts and that senate districts be apportioned within executive council districts and giving county boundaries priority in senate district apportionment.}, howpublished = {Granite Record}, url = {https://graniterecord.org/bill/2009/cacr10}, note = {Accessed 24 Oct. 2026} }
CACR 10 (2009)
relating to: electoral districts. Providing that: representative districts be apportioned within senate districts and that senate districts be apportioned within executive council districts and giving county boundaries priority in senate district apportionment.
- Status: Killed
- Term: 2009-2010
- Senate committee: Election Law and Veterans' Affairs
- Subject: Constitutional Amendments
The Story
It was introduced on January 8, 2009 and referred to the Senate Election Law and Veterans' Affairs committee. The committee held a public hearing on February 17, 2009. The committee recommended that the Senate kill it. On March 11, 2009 the Senate voted to kill it on a voice vote.
Sponsors
- Sen. William Denley (R - SD3) (prime sponsor)
- Rep. Joseph Fleck (R - Carr 5)
- Rep. Dino Scala (R - Carr 5)
Hearings and Sessions
- February 17, 2009, 9:30 AM: hearing, Senate Election Law and Veterans' Affairs, LOB 101
Votes
- March 11, 2009, Senate: Inexpedient to Legislate — voice vote, passed
The Docket
- January 8, 2009: Introduced and Referred to Election Law and Veterans' Affairs
- February 17, 2009: Hearing; === CANCELLED === February 17, 2009, Room 101, LOB, 9:20 a.m.; SC9
- February 17, 2009: Hearing; February 17, 2009, Room 101, LOB, 9:30 a.m.; SC9
- March 3, 2009: Committee Report; Inexpedient to Legislate [3/11/09]; SC14
- March 11, 2009: Inexpedient to Legislate, MA, VV
Laws It Would Change
- Part Second, Article 9 of the state Constitution
- Part Second, Article 11 of the state Constitution
- Part Second, Article 11-a of the state Constitution
- Part Second, Article 25 of the state Constitution
- Part Second, Article 26 of the state Constitution
- Part Second, Article 65 of the state Constitution