HB 1721-FN (2006): relative to changes in the use of weighted caseload statistics in the calculation of the salaries of part-time district court justices.
Cite this page
Granite Record indexes the General Court’s record; it is not that record. Where a citation allows only one source, cite the General Court — every page here links to what it is drawn from. The date below is the day the page was read.
- MLA
- “HB 1721-FN (2006): relative to changes in the use of weighted caseload statistics in the calculation of the salaries of part-time district court justices.” Granite Record, https://graniterecord.org/bill/2006/hb1721. Accessed 24 Oct. 2026.
- APA
- Granite Record. (n.d.). HB 1721-FN (2006): relative to changes in the use of weighted caseload statistics in the calculation of the salaries of part-time district court justices. Retrieved 24 Oct. 2026, from https://graniterecord.org/bill/2006/hb1721
- Chicago
- Granite Record. “HB 1721-FN (2006): relative to changes in the use of weighted caseload statistics in the calculation of the salaries of part-time district court justices.” Accessed 24 Oct. 2026. https://graniterecord.org/bill/2006/hb1721.
- BibTeX
@misc{bill-2006-hb1721, title = {HB 1721-FN (2006): relative to changes in the use of weighted caseload statistics in the calculation of the salaries of part-time district court justices.}, howpublished = {Granite Record}, url = {https://graniterecord.org/bill/2006/hb1721}, note = {Accessed 24 Oct. 2026} }
HB 1721-FN (2006)
relative to changes in the use of weighted caseload statistics in the calculation of the salaries of part-time district court justices.
- Status: Referred for interim study
- Term: 2005-2006
- House committee: Judiciary
- Subject: Courts and Procedure
The Story
It was introduced on January 4, 2006 and referred to the House Judiciary committee. The committee held a public hearing on January 17, 2006. The committee held a work session on January 24, 2006. The committee voted unanimously, 17–0, to recommend that the House study it after the session ends, and the report was placed on the consent calendar. On February 1, 2006 the House voted to study it after the session ends on a voice vote. The committee reported back on its interim study of the bill: “REC FOR LEGIS IN 2007”, by a vote of 13 to 2.
Sponsors
- Rep. Cynthia Dokmo (R - Hills 6) (prime sponsor)
- Sen. Joseph Foster (D - SD13)
Hearings and Sessions
- January 17, 2006, 10:45 AM: public hearing, House Judiciary, RM208/LOB
- January 24, 2006, 2:00 PM: subcommittee work session, House Judiciary, RM208/LOB
Votes
- February 1, 2006, House: Refer for Interim Study — voice vote, passed
The Docket
- January 4, 2006: Introduced and ref to Judiciary
- January 17, 2006: Public Hearing Jan 17 10:45 RM208/LOB
- January 24, 2006: Subcommittee Work Session Jan 24 2:00 RM208/LOB
- January 26, 2006: Comm Rprt: Ref Interim Study for Feb 1 (vote 17-0; CC)
- February 1, 2006: Interim Study, MA, VV
- May 24, 2006: ref to Judiciary for Interim Study
- October 19, 2006: Interim Study Report: REC FOR LEGIS IN 2007 (Vote 13-2)