HB 1289 (2006): relative to Pennichuck Brook and its watershed.

Cite this page

Granite Record indexes the General Court’s record; it is not that record. Where a citation allows only one source, cite the General Court — every page here links to what it is drawn from. The date below is the day the page was read.

MLA
“HB 1289 (2006): relative to Pennichuck Brook and its watershed.” Granite Record, https://graniterecord.org/bill/2006/hb1289. Accessed 24 Oct. 2026.
APA
Granite Record. (n.d.). HB 1289 (2006): relative to Pennichuck Brook and its watershed. Retrieved 24 Oct. 2026, from https://graniterecord.org/bill/2006/hb1289
Chicago
Granite Record. “HB 1289 (2006): relative to Pennichuck Brook and its watershed.” Accessed 24 Oct. 2026. https://graniterecord.org/bill/2006/hb1289.
BibTeX
@misc{bill-2006-hb1289, title = {HB 1289 (2006): relative to Pennichuck Brook and its watershed.}, howpublished = {Granite Record}, url = {https://graniterecord.org/bill/2006/hb1289}, note = {Accessed 24 Oct. 2026} }

HB 1289 (2006)

relative to Pennichuck Brook and its watershed.

  • Status: Killed
  • Term: 2005-2006
  • House committee: Resources, Recreation and Development
  • Senate committee: Energy and Economic Development
  • Subject: Environment - Administration

The Story

It was introduced on January 4, 2006 and referred to the House Resources, Recreation and Development committee. The committee held a public hearing on January 17, 2006. The committee held work sessions on January 25, 2006, February 14, 2006 and February 16, 2006. The committee voted unanimously, 18–0, to recommend that the House pass it with changes (amendment 0973h), and the report was placed on the consent calendar. On March 7, 2006 the House voted to pass it with changes on a voice vote. It crossed to the Senate on March 22, 2006 and was referred to the Senate Energy and Economic Development committee. The committee held a public hearing on April 18, 2006. The committee recommended that the Senate kill it. On May 4, 2006 the Senate voted to kill it on a voice vote.

Sponsors

Hearings and Sessions

  • January 17, 2006, 10:45 AM: public hearing, RM305/LOB
  • January 25, 2006, 11:00 AM: subcommittee work session, RM305/LOB
  • February 14, 2006, 11:30 AM: subcommittee work session, RM305/LOB
  • February 16, 2006, 9:30 AM: subcommittee work session, RM206/LOB
  • April 18, 2006, 3:00 PM: hearing, Senate Energy and Economic Development, LOB 102

Votes

  • March 7, 2006, House: Ought to Pass with Amendment — voice vote, passed
  • May 4, 2006, Senate: Inexpedient to Legislate — voice vote, passed

The Docket

  • January 4, 2006: Introduced & ref: Resources, Recreation and Development
  • January 17, 2006: Public Hearing Jan 17 10:45 RM305/LOB
  • January 25, 2006: Subcommittee Work Session Jan 25 11:00 RM305/LOB
  • February 14, 2006: Subcommittee Work Session Feb 14 11:30 RM305/LOB
  • February 16, 2006: Subcommittee Work Session Feb 16 9:30 RM206/LOB
  • February 23, 2006: Comm Rprt: OTP/AM {0973h} for March 7 (vote 18-0; CC)
  • March 7, 2006: Passed with AM {0973h}, MA, VV
  • March 22, 2006: Introduced and Referred to Energy and Economic Development
  • April 18, 2006: Hearing; April 18, 2006, Room 102, LOB, 3:00 p.m.; SC13
  • April 19, 2006: Committee Report; Inexpedient to Legislate [05/04/06]; SC16
  • May 4, 2006: Inexpedient to Legislate, MA, VV

Laws It Would Change

From the General Court