CACR 44 (2006): relating to limits on the taking of private property. Providing that a person's property shall not be taken by eminent domain if the taking is for private use.

Cite this page

Granite Record indexes the General Court’s record; it is not that record. Where a citation allows only one source, cite the General Court — every page here links to what it is drawn from. The date below is the day the page was read.

MLA
“CACR 44 (2006): relating to limits on the taking of private property. Providing that a person's property shall not be taken by eminent domain if the taking is for private use.” Granite Record, https://graniterecord.org/bill/2006/cacr44. Accessed 24 Oct. 2026.
APA
Granite Record. (n.d.). CACR 44 (2006): relating to limits on the taking of private property. Providing that a person's property shall not be taken by eminent domain if the taking is for private use. Retrieved 24 Oct. 2026, from https://graniterecord.org/bill/2006/cacr44
Chicago
Granite Record. “CACR 44 (2006): relating to limits on the taking of private property. Providing that a person's property shall not be taken by eminent domain if the taking is for private use.” Accessed 24 Oct. 2026. https://graniterecord.org/bill/2006/cacr44.
BibTeX
@misc{bill-2006-cacr44, title = {CACR 44 (2006): relating to limits on the taking of private property. Providing that a person's property shall not be taken by eminent domain if the taking is for private use.}, howpublished = {Granite Record}, url = {https://graniterecord.org/bill/2006/cacr44}, note = {Accessed 24 Oct. 2026} }

CACR 44 (2006)

relating to limits on the taking of private property. Providing that a person's property shall not be taken by eminent domain if the taking is for private use.

  • Status: Killed
  • Term: 2005-2006
  • House committee: Judiciary
  • Subject: Constitutional Amendments

The Story

It was introduced on March 16, 2006 and referred to the Senate Finance committee. The committee held a public hearing on March 20, 2006. The committee recommended that the Senate pass it. A floor amendment (1489), offered by Sen. Burling, was rejected on a roll call 8–16 on March 22, 2006. On March 22, 2006 the Senate voted to pass it and ordered it to a third reading. On March 22, 2006 the Senate voted to pass it. It crossed to the House on March 22, 2006 and was referred to the House Judiciary committee. The committee held a public hearing on April 4, 2006. The committee voted 20–1 to recommend that the House kill it, and the report was placed on the consent calendar. On April 26, 2006 the House voted to kill it on a voice vote.

Sponsors

Hearings and Sessions

  • March 20, 2006, 10:30 AM: hearing, SH 100
  • April 4, 2006, 11:00 AM: public hearing, RM208/LOB

Votes

  • March 22, 2006, Senate: Floor Amendment (1489s) Sen. D'Allesandro/Sen. Estabrook — yeas 8, nays 16, failed
  • March 22, 2006, Senate: Ought to Pass Nec 3/5 Sen. Barnes/Sen. Estabrook — yeas 20, nays 4, passed
  • April 26, 2006, House: Inexpedient to Legislate — voice vote, passed

The Docket

  • March 16, 2006: Introduced and Referred to Finance
  • March 20, 2006: Hearing; March 20, 2006, Room 100, State House, 10:30 a.m.; SC11
  • March 20, 2006: Committee Report; Ought to Pass [03/22/06]; SC11A
  • March 22, 2006: Sen. Burling Floor Amendment{1489}(New Title), RC8Y-16N, AF
  • March 22, 2006: Ought to Pass, 20Y-4N, Adopted by Nec,3/5; OT3rdg
  • March 22, 2006: Passed by Third Reading Resolution
  • March 22, 2006: Introduced and ref Judiciary
  • April 4, 2006: Public Hearing April 4 11:00 RM208/LOB
  • April 20, 2006: Comm Rprt: ITL April 26 (vote 20-1; CC)
  • April 26, 2006: ITL, MA, VV

Laws It Would Change

Related Bills

  • CACR 30 (2006): RELATING TO: limits on the taking of private property. PROVIDING THAT: a person’s property shall not be taken by eminent domain if the taking is for private use.

From the General Court