CACR 39 (2006): relating to the administration of the supreme court. Providing that supreme court rules shall no longer have the force and effect of law.
Cite this page
Granite Record indexes the General Court’s record; it is not that record. Where a citation allows only one source, cite the General Court — every page here links to what it is drawn from. The date below is the day the page was read.
- MLA
- “CACR 39 (2006): relating to the administration of the supreme court. Providing that supreme court rules shall no longer have the force and effect of law.” Granite Record, https://graniterecord.org/bill/2006/cacr39. Accessed 24 Oct. 2026.
- APA
- Granite Record. (n.d.). CACR 39 (2006): relating to the administration of the supreme court. Providing that supreme court rules shall no longer have the force and effect of law. Retrieved 24 Oct. 2026, from https://graniterecord.org/bill/2006/cacr39
- Chicago
- Granite Record. “CACR 39 (2006): relating to the administration of the supreme court. Providing that supreme court rules shall no longer have the force and effect of law.” Accessed 24 Oct. 2026. https://graniterecord.org/bill/2006/cacr39.
- BibTeX
@misc{bill-2006-cacr39, title = {CACR 39 (2006): relating to the administration of the supreme court. Providing that supreme court rules shall no longer have the force and effect of law.}, howpublished = {Granite Record}, url = {https://graniterecord.org/bill/2006/cacr39}, note = {Accessed 24 Oct. 2026} }
CACR 39 (2006)
relating to the administration of the supreme court. Providing that supreme court rules shall no longer have the force and effect of law.
- Status: Killed
- Term: 2005-2006
- House committee: Judiciary
- Subject: Constitutional Amendments
The Story
It was introduced on January 4, 2006 and referred to the House Judiciary committee. The committee held a public hearing on January 19, 2006. The committee held work sessions on January 25, 2006 and January 31, 2006. The majority recommended that the House kill it, and the minority recommended that the House pass it, by a vote of 14–6. The report was placed on the regular calendar. On February 22, 2006 the House voted to kill it on a voice vote.
Sponsors
Hearings and Sessions
- January 19, 2006, 11:00 AM: public hearing, RM208/LOB
- January 25, 2006, 2:15 PM: subcommittee work session, RM208/LOB
- January 31, 2006, 2:00 PM: subcommittee work session, RM208/LOB
Votes
- February 22, 2006, House: Inexpedient to Legislate — voice vote, passed
The Docket
- January 4, 2006: Introduce and ref to Judiciary
- January 19, 2006: Public Hearing Jan 19 11:00 RM208/LOB
- January 25, 2006: Subcommittee Work Session Jan 25 2:15 RM208/LOB
- January 31, 2006: Subcommittee Work Session Jan 31 2:00 RM208/LOB
- February 15, 2006: Maj Rprt: ITL for Feb 22 (vote 14-6; RC)
- February 15, 2006: Min Rprt: OTP
- February 22, 2006: ITL, MA, VV
Laws It Would Change
- Part Second, Article 73-a of the state Constitution