CACR 36 (2006): relating to the rulemaking authority of the supreme court. Providing that the supreme court may adopt rules, that the general court may regulate these matters by statute, and that in the event of a conflict between a statute and a rule, the statute, if otherwise valid, shall prevail over the rule.

Cite this page

Granite Record indexes the General Court’s record; it is not that record. Where a citation allows only one source, cite the General Court — every page here links to what it is drawn from. The date below is the day the page was read.

MLA
“CACR 36 (2006): relating to the rulemaking authority of the supreme court. Providing that the supreme court may adopt rules, that the general court may regulate these matters by statute, and that in the event of a conflict between a statute and a rule, the statute, if otherwise valid, shall prevail over the rule.” Granite Record, https://graniterecord.org/bill/2006/cacr36. Accessed 24 Oct. 2026.
APA
Granite Record. (n.d.). CACR 36 (2006): relating to the rulemaking authority of the supreme court. Providing that the supreme court may adopt rules, that the general court may regulate these matters by statute, and that in the event of a conflict between a statute and a rule, the statute, if otherwise valid, shall prevail over the rule. Retrieved 24 Oct. 2026, from https://graniterecord.org/bill/2006/cacr36
Chicago
Granite Record. “CACR 36 (2006): relating to the rulemaking authority of the supreme court. Providing that the supreme court may adopt rules, that the general court may regulate these matters by statute, and that in the event of a conflict between a statute and a rule, the statute, if otherwise valid, shall prevail over the rule.” Accessed 24 Oct. 2026. https://graniterecord.org/bill/2006/cacr36.
BibTeX
@misc{bill-2006-cacr36, title = {CACR 36 (2006): relating to the rulemaking authority of the supreme court. Providing that the supreme court may adopt rules, that the general court may regulate these matters by statute, and that in the event of a conflict between a statute and a rule, the statute, if otherwise valid, shall prevail over the rule.}, howpublished = {Granite Record}, url = {https://graniterecord.org/bill/2006/cacr36}, note = {Accessed 24 Oct. 2026} }

CACR 36 (2006)

relating to the rulemaking authority of the supreme court. Providing that the supreme court may adopt rules, that the general court may regulate these matters by statute, and that in the event of a conflict between a statute and a rule, the statute, if otherwise valid, shall prevail over the rule.

  • Status: Killed
  • Term: 2005-2006
  • House committee: Judiciary
  • Subject: Constitutional Amendments

The Story

It was introduced on January 4, 2006 and referred to the House Judiciary committee. The committee held a public hearing on January 19, 2006. The committee held work sessions on January 25, 2006 and January 31, 2006. The committee voted 16–4 to recommend that the House kill it, and the report was placed on the regular calendar. On March 7, 2006 the House adopted “March 8” on a voice vote. On March 8, 2006 the House voted to kill it on a voice vote.

Sponsors

Hearings and Sessions

  • January 19, 2006, 10:00 AM: public hearing, House Judiciary, RM208/LOB
  • January 25, 2006, 2:15 PM: subcommittee work session, House Judiciary, RM208/LOB
  • January 31, 2006, 2:00 PM: subcommittee work session, House Judiciary, RM208/LOB

Votes

  • March 7, 2006, House: March 8 — voice vote, passed
  • March 8, 2006, House: Inexpedient to Legislate — voice vote, passed

The Docket

  • January 4, 2006: Introduced and ref to Judiciary
  • January 19, 2006: Public Hearing Jan 19 10:00 RM208/LOB
  • January 25, 2006: Subcommittee Work Session Jan 25 2:15 RM208/LOB
  • January 31, 2006: Subcommittee Work Session Jan 31 2:00 RM208/LOB
  • February 23, 2006: Comm Rprt: ITL for March 7 (vote 16-4; RC)
  • March 7, 2006: Special Ordered to Beginning of Reg Cal., March 8, MA, VV
  • March 8, 2006: ITL, MA, VV

Related Bills

  • CACR 5 (2004): relating to the rulemaking authority of the supreme court. Providing that the supreme court may adopt rules, that the general court may regulate these matters by statute, and that in the event of a conflict between a statute and a rule, the statute, if otherwise valid, shall prevail over the rule.

From the General Court