HB 705 (2005): relative to passenger restraints.

Cite this page

Granite Record indexes the General Court’s record; it is not that record. Where a citation allows only one source, cite the General Court — every page here links to what it is drawn from. The date below is the day the page was read.

MLA
“HB 705 (2005): relative to passenger restraints.” Granite Record, https://graniterecord.org/bill/2005/hb705. Accessed 24 Oct. 2026.
APA
Granite Record. (n.d.). HB 705 (2005): relative to passenger restraints. Retrieved 24 Oct. 2026, from https://graniterecord.org/bill/2005/hb705
Chicago
Granite Record. “HB 705 (2005): relative to passenger restraints.” Accessed 24 Oct. 2026. https://graniterecord.org/bill/2005/hb705.
BibTeX
@misc{bill-2005-hb705, title = {HB 705 (2005): relative to passenger restraints.}, howpublished = {Granite Record}, url = {https://graniterecord.org/bill/2005/hb705}, note = {Accessed 24 Oct. 2026} }

HB 705 (2005)

relative to passenger restraints.

  • Status: Killed
  • Term: 2005-2006
  • House committee: Transportation
  • Subject: Motor Vehicles

The Story

It was introduced on January 26, 2005 and referred to the House Transportation committee. The committee held a public hearing on February 17, 2005. The committee voted 12–2 to recommend that the House kill it. On March 30, 2005 the House adopted “Susp Rules for Action Deadline” on a voice vote. On April 6, 2005 the House voted to kill it on a roll call 180–124.

Sponsors

Hearings and Sessions

  • February 17, 2005, 2:15 PM: hearing, House Transportation, RM203,LOB

Votes

  • March 30, 2005, House: Susp Rules for Action Deadline — voice vote, passed
  • April 6, 2005, House: COMMITTEE REPORT: ITL — yeas 180, nays 124, passed

The Docket

  • January 26, 2005: Introduced and ref to Transportation
  • February 17, 2005: Hearing Feb 17 2:15 RM203,LOB
  • March 15, 2005: Comm Report ITL for Mar 30 (vote 12-2;Reg)
  • March 30, 2005: Reps O'Neil & Craig Susp Rules for Action Deadline, MA 2/3VV
  • April 6, 2005: ITL MA RC(180-124)

Laws It Would Change

From the General Court