CACR 12 (2005): relating to judicial conduct. Providing that the people of New Hampshire, in a manner established by law, shall be responsible for investigating and evaluating the conduct of members of the judicial branch.

Cite this page

Granite Record indexes the General Court’s record; it is not that record. Where a citation allows only one source, cite the General Court — every page here links to what it is drawn from. The date below is the day the page was read.

MLA
“CACR 12 (2005): relating to judicial conduct. Providing that the people of New Hampshire, in a manner established by law, shall be responsible for investigating and evaluating the conduct of members of the judicial branch.” Granite Record, https://graniterecord.org/bill/2005/cacr12. Accessed 24 Oct. 2026.
APA
Granite Record. (n.d.). CACR 12 (2005): relating to judicial conduct. Providing that the people of New Hampshire, in a manner established by law, shall be responsible for investigating and evaluating the conduct of members of the judicial branch. Retrieved 24 Oct. 2026, from https://graniterecord.org/bill/2005/cacr12
Chicago
Granite Record. “CACR 12 (2005): relating to judicial conduct. Providing that the people of New Hampshire, in a manner established by law, shall be responsible for investigating and evaluating the conduct of members of the judicial branch.” Accessed 24 Oct. 2026. https://graniterecord.org/bill/2005/cacr12.
BibTeX
@misc{bill-2005-cacr12, title = {CACR 12 (2005): relating to judicial conduct. Providing that the people of New Hampshire, in a manner established by law, shall be responsible for investigating and evaluating the conduct of members of the judicial branch.}, howpublished = {Granite Record}, url = {https://graniterecord.org/bill/2005/cacr12}, note = {Accessed 24 Oct. 2026} }

CACR 12 (2005)

relating to judicial conduct. Providing that the people of New Hampshire, in a manner established by law, shall be responsible for investigating and evaluating the conduct of members of the judicial branch.

  • Status: Killed
  • Term: 2005-2006
  • House committee: Judiciary
  • Subject: Constitutional Amendments

The Story

It was introduced on January 26, 2005 and referred to the House Judiciary committee. The committee held a public hearing on February 24, 2005. The committee voted 15–5 to recommend that the House pass it. On March 30, 2005 the House voted to kill it on a voice vote.

Sponsors

Hearings and Sessions

  • February 24, 2005, 2:00 PM: hearing, House Judiciary, RM208,LOB

Votes

  • March 30, 2005, House: Inexpedient to Legislate — voice vote, passed
  • March 31, 2005, House: COMMITTEE REPORT: OTP — yeas 160, nays 181, failed

The Docket

  • January 26, 2005: Introduced and ref to Judiciary
  • February 3, 2005: ==CANCELLED(Storm)==Hearing Feb 10 2:00 RM208,LOB
  • February 24, 2005: Rescheduled Hearing Feb 24 2:00 RM208,LOB
  • March 24, 2005: Comm Report OTP for Mar 30 (vote 15-5;Reg)
  • March 30, 2005: OTP ML RC(160-181); Rep Dokmo moved ITL, ITL MA VV

Laws It Would Change

From the General Court