HB 545 (2004): requiring building contractors to disclose the name of any subcontractors involved in the project.

Cite this page

Granite Record indexes the General Court’s record; it is not that record. Where a citation allows only one source, cite the General Court — every page here links to what it is drawn from. The date below is the day the page was read.

MLA
“HB 545 (2004): requiring building contractors to disclose the name of any subcontractors involved in the project.” Granite Record, https://graniterecord.org/bill/2004/hb545. Accessed 24 Oct. 2026.
APA
Granite Record. (n.d.). HB 545 (2004): requiring building contractors to disclose the name of any subcontractors involved in the project. Retrieved 24 Oct. 2026, from https://graniterecord.org/bill/2004/hb545
Chicago
Granite Record. “HB 545 (2004): requiring building contractors to disclose the name of any subcontractors involved in the project.” Accessed 24 Oct. 2026. https://graniterecord.org/bill/2004/hb545.
BibTeX
@misc{bill-2004-hb545, title = {HB 545 (2004): requiring building contractors to disclose the name of any subcontractors involved in the project.}, howpublished = {Granite Record}, url = {https://graniterecord.org/bill/2004/hb545}, note = {Accessed 24 Oct. 2026} }

HB 545 (2004)

requiring building contractors to disclose the name of any subcontractors involved in the project.

  • Status: Referred for interim study
  • Term: 2003-2004
  • House committee: Commerce
  • Subject: Miscellaneous

The Story

It was introduced on January 9, 2003 and referred to the House Commerce committee. The committee held a public hearing on February 4, 2003. The committee held work sessions on February 19, 2003 and March 5, 2003. The committee retained the bill, holding it for further work rather than reporting it out this year. The committee held work sessions on October 28, 2003 and November 6, 2003. The majority of the committee recommended that the House study it after the session ends unanimously, 14–0, and the report was placed on the consent calendar. On January 7, 2004 the House voted to study it after the session ends. The committee reported back on its interim study of the bill: “NOT REC FOR LEGIS IN 2005”, by a vote of 11 to 0.

Sponsors

Hearings and Sessions

  • February 4, 2003, 2:00 PM: hearing, House Commerce, RM302,LOB
  • February 19, 2003, 8:45 AM: subcommittee work session, House Commerce, RM302,LOB <Rep Vachon>
  • March 5, 2003, 8:45 AM: subcommittee work session, House Commerce, RM302,LOB <Rep Vachon>
  • October 28, 2003, 10:00 AM: subcommittee work session, House Commerce, RM302,LOB
  • November 6, 2003, 11:00 AM: subcommittee work session, House Commerce, RM302,LOB <Rep D. Flanders>

The Docket

  • January 9, 2003: Introduced and ref to Commerce
  • February 4, 2003: Hearing Feb 4 2:00 RM302,LOB
  • February 19, 2003: Subcom Work Session Feb 19 8:45 RM302,LOB <Rep Vachon>
  • March 5, 2003: Subcom Work Session Mar 5 8:45 RM302,LOB <Rep Vachon>
  • March 19, 2003: Retained in Committee
  • October 28, 2003: Subcom work session Oct 28 10:00 RM302,LOB
  • November 6, 2003: Subcom work session Nov 6 11:00 RM302,LOB <Rep D. Flanders>
  • November 25, 2003: Maj Report REF FOR INT STUDY for Jan 7, 2004 Session (vote 14-0;CC)
  • January 7, 2004: Referred to Commerce for Interim Study
  • June 18, 2004: (Interim Study Subcom: Reps Donald Flanders, Langley, Kopka & Scamman)
  • November 8, 2004: Int Study Report: NOT REC FOR LEGIS IN 2005 (vote 11-0)

From the General Court