CACR 26 (2004): relating to the apportionment of representatives. Providing that representation in the house of representatives shall be as equal as one person, one vote, as defined by certain federal courts will permit.
Cite this page
Granite Record indexes the General Court’s record; it is not that record. Where a citation allows only one source, cite the General Court — every page here links to what it is drawn from. The date below is the day the page was read.
- MLA
- “CACR 26 (2004): relating to the apportionment of representatives. Providing that representation in the house of representatives shall be as equal as one person, one vote, as defined by certain federal courts will permit.” Granite Record, https://graniterecord.org/bill/2004/cacr26. Accessed 24 Oct. 2026.
- APA
- Granite Record. (n.d.). CACR 26 (2004): relating to the apportionment of representatives. Providing that representation in the house of representatives shall be as equal as one person, one vote, as defined by certain federal courts will permit. Retrieved 24 Oct. 2026, from https://graniterecord.org/bill/2004/cacr26
- Chicago
- Granite Record. “CACR 26 (2004): relating to the apportionment of representatives. Providing that representation in the house of representatives shall be as equal as one person, one vote, as defined by certain federal courts will permit.” Accessed 24 Oct. 2026. https://graniterecord.org/bill/2004/cacr26.
- BibTeX
@misc{bill-2004-cacr26, title = {CACR 26 (2004): relating to the apportionment of representatives. Providing that representation in the house of representatives shall be as equal as one person, one vote, as defined by certain federal courts will permit.}, howpublished = {Granite Record}, url = {https://graniterecord.org/bill/2004/cacr26}, note = {Accessed 24 Oct. 2026} }
CACR 26 (2004)
relating to the apportionment of representatives. Providing that representation in the house of representatives shall be as equal as one person, one vote, as defined by certain federal courts will permit.
- Status: Killed
- Term: 2003-2004
- House committee: Election Law
- Subject: Constitutional Amendments
The Story
It was introduced on September 4, 2003 and referred to the House Election Law committee. The committee held a public hearing on January 13, 2004. The majority of the committee recommended that the House kill it unanimously, 17–0, and the report was placed on the consent calendar. On February 19, 2004 the House voted to kill it.
Sponsors
- Rep. John Alger (R - Graf 14) (prime sponsor)
- Rep. James Phinizy (D - Sull 23)
- Rep. Howard Dickinson (R - Carr 4)
- Rep. Kenneth Weyler (R - Rock 79)
- Sen. Carl Johnson (R - SD2)
Hearings and Sessions
- January 13, 2004, 11:00 AM: hearing, House Election Law, RM308,LOB
The Docket
- September 4, 2003: Introduced and ref to Elec Law
- January 13, 2004: Hearing Jan 13 11:00 RM308,LOB
- February 10, 2004: Maj Report ITL for Feb 19 (vote 17-0;CC)
- February 19, 2004: ITL Report Adopted
Laws It Would Change
- Part Second, Article 9 of the state Constitution