HB 636-FN (2003): relative to mandatory automobile insurance.

Cite this page

Granite Record indexes the General Court’s record; it is not that record. Where a citation allows only one source, cite the General Court — every page here links to what it is drawn from. The date below is the day the page was read.

MLA
“HB 636-FN (2003): relative to mandatory automobile insurance.” Granite Record, https://graniterecord.org/bill/2003/hb636. Accessed 24 Oct. 2026.
APA
Granite Record. (n.d.). HB 636-FN (2003): relative to mandatory automobile insurance. Retrieved 24 Oct. 2026, from https://graniterecord.org/bill/2003/hb636
Chicago
Granite Record. “HB 636-FN (2003): relative to mandatory automobile insurance.” Accessed 24 Oct. 2026. https://graniterecord.org/bill/2003/hb636.
BibTeX
@misc{bill-2003-hb636, title = {HB 636-FN (2003): relative to mandatory automobile insurance.}, howpublished = {Granite Record}, url = {https://graniterecord.org/bill/2003/hb636}, note = {Accessed 24 Oct. 2026} }

HB 636-FN (2003)

relative to mandatory automobile insurance.

  • Status: Killed
  • Term: 2003-2004
  • House committee: Commerce
  • Subject: Motor Vehicles

The Story

It was introduced on January 9, 2003 and referred to the House Commerce committee. The committee held a public hearing on March 5, 2003. The majority of the committee recommended that the House kill it by a vote of 12–2, and the report was placed on the consent calendar. The bill was taken off the consent calendar on March 25, 2003. On March 26, 2003 the House voted to kill it on a voice vote.

Sponsors

Hearings and Sessions

  • March 5, 2003, 2:30 PM: hearing, House Commerce, RM302,LOB

Votes

  • March 26, 2003, House: Inexpedient to Legislate — voice vote, passed

The Docket

  • January 9, 2003: Introduced and ref to Commerce
  • March 5, 2003: Hearing Mar 5 2:30 RM302,LOB
  • March 19, 2003: Maj Report ITL for Mar 25 (Vote 12-2;CC)
  • March 25, 2003: Removed from Consent Cal, req Rep Arnold; HJ29, p817
  • March 26, 2003: ITL Report Adopted VV; HJ30, p991

Laws It Would Change

Related Bills

From the General Court