HB 1309 (2002): prohibiting arrests for violation-level offenses.

Cite this page

Granite Record indexes the General Court’s record; it is not that record. Where a citation allows only one source, cite the General Court — every page here links to what it is drawn from. The date below is the day the page was read.

MLA
“HB 1309 (2002): prohibiting arrests for violation-level offenses.” Granite Record, https://graniterecord.org/bill/2002/hb1309. Accessed 24 Oct. 2026.
APA
Granite Record. (n.d.). HB 1309 (2002): prohibiting arrests for violation-level offenses. Retrieved 24 Oct. 2026, from https://graniterecord.org/bill/2002/hb1309
Chicago
Granite Record. “HB 1309 (2002): prohibiting arrests for violation-level offenses.” Accessed 24 Oct. 2026. https://graniterecord.org/bill/2002/hb1309.
BibTeX
@misc{bill-2002-hb1309, title = {HB 1309 (2002): prohibiting arrests for violation-level offenses.}, howpublished = {Granite Record}, url = {https://graniterecord.org/bill/2002/hb1309}, note = {Accessed 24 Oct. 2026} }

HB 1309 (2002)

prohibiting arrests for violation-level offenses.

  • Status: Killed
  • Term: 2001-2002
  • House committee: Criminal Justice and Public Safety
  • Subject: Crimes, Criminal Procedure and Corrections

The Story

It was introduced on June 26, 2001 and referred to the House Criminal Justice and Public Safety committee. The committee held a public hearing on January 16, 2002. The majority of the committee recommended that the House kill it unanimously, 14–0, and the report was placed on the consent calendar. On January 24, 2002 the House voted to kill it.

Sponsors

Hearings and Sessions

  • January 16, 2002, 1:30 PM: hearing, House Criminal Justice and Public Safety, RM204,LOB

The Docket

  • June 26, 2001: Introduced and ref to Crim Just & PSfty; HJ78, p1997
  • December 14, 2001: Copy to Chairman on 12/18/2001 Report due on 2/21/2002
  • January 16, 2002: Hearing Jan 16 1:30 RM204,LOB
  • January 16, 2002: Maj Report ITL for Jan 24 (vote 14-0;CC)
  • January 24, 2002: ITL Report Adopted; HJ11, p442

Laws It Would Change

From the General Court