CACR 24 (2002): relating to establishing a maximum rate for a sales tax. Providing that the rate of any sales tax established in law shall not exceed 2 1/2 percent, provided that a higher rate may be established by a 2/3 vote of those present and voting in each house of the general court.

Cite this page

Granite Record indexes the General Court’s record; it is not that record. Where a citation allows only one source, cite the General Court — every page here links to what it is drawn from. The date below is the day the page was read.

MLA
“CACR 24 (2002): relating to establishing a maximum rate for a sales tax. Providing that the rate of any sales tax established in law shall not exceed 2 1/2 percent, provided that a higher rate may be established by a 2/3 vote of those present and voting in each house of the general court.” Granite Record, https://graniterecord.org/bill/2002/cacr24. Accessed 24 Oct. 2026.
APA
Granite Record. (n.d.). CACR 24 (2002): relating to establishing a maximum rate for a sales tax. Providing that the rate of any sales tax established in law shall not exceed 2 1/2 percent, provided that a higher rate may be established by a 2/3 vote of those present and voting in each house of the general court. Retrieved 24 Oct. 2026, from https://graniterecord.org/bill/2002/cacr24
Chicago
Granite Record. “CACR 24 (2002): relating to establishing a maximum rate for a sales tax. Providing that the rate of any sales tax established in law shall not exceed 2 1/2 percent, provided that a higher rate may be established by a 2/3 vote of those present and voting in each house of the general court.” Accessed 24 Oct. 2026. https://graniterecord.org/bill/2002/cacr24.
BibTeX
@misc{bill-2002-cacr24, title = {CACR 24 (2002): relating to establishing a maximum rate for a sales tax. Providing that the rate of any sales tax established in law shall not exceed 2 1/2 percent, provided that a higher rate may be established by a 2/3 vote of those present and voting in each house of the general court.}, howpublished = {Granite Record}, url = {https://graniterecord.org/bill/2002/cacr24}, note = {Accessed 24 Oct. 2026} }

CACR 24 (2002)

relating to establishing a maximum rate for a sales tax. Providing that the rate of any sales tax established in law shall not exceed 2 1/2 percent, provided that a higher rate may be established by a 2/3 vote of those present and voting in each house of the general court.

  • Status: Killed
  • Term: 2001-2002
  • House committee: Ways and Means
  • Subject: Constitutional Amendments

The Story

It was introduced on March 8, 2001 and referred to the House Ways and Means committee. The committee held a public hearing on March 27, 2001. The committee retained the bill, holding it for further work rather than reporting it out this year. The committee held work sessions on May 16, 2001, October 18, 2001 and October 24, 2001. The majority of the committee recommended that the House kill it unanimously, 17–0, and the report was placed on the consent calendar. On January 2, 2002 the House voted to kill it.

Sponsors

Hearings and Sessions

  • March 27, 2001, 2:00 PM: hearing, House Ways and Means, RM202,LOB
  • May 16, 2001, 10:30 AM: subcommittee work session, House Ways and Means, RM202,LOB
  • October 18, 2001, 10:00 AM: subcommittee work session, House Ways and Means, RM202,LOB
  • October 24, 2001, 1:00 PM: subcommittee work session, House Ways and Means, RM202,LOB

The Docket

  • March 8, 2001: Introduced and ref to Ways & Means; HJ26, p496
  • March 15, 2001: Copy to Chairman on 3/15/2001
  • March 27, 2001: Hearing Mar 27 2:00 RM202,LOB
  • April 12, 2001: Retained in Committee
  • May 1, 2001: (Subcom: Reps Major, Camm, Dickinson, Alukonis, D Cote & Lasky)
  • May 16, 2001: Subcom Work Session May 16 10:30 RM202,LOB
  • October 9, 2001: =CANCELLED=Subcom Work Sessions Oct 31 & Nov 7 10:00 RM202,LOB
  • October 18, 2001: Subcom Work Session Oct 18 10:00 RM202,LOB
  • October 24, 2001: Subcom Work Session Oct 24 1:00 RM202,LOB
  • December 11, 2001: Maj Report ITL for Jan 2 (vote 17-0;CC)
  • January 2, 2002: ITL Report Adopted; HJ5, p206

Laws It Would Change

From the General Court