CACR 15 (2002): relating to a balanced budget. Providing that the governor shall not propose, nor shall the general court approve, an operating budget in which expenditures exceed estimated revenue.

Cite this page

Granite Record indexes the General Court’s record; it is not that record. Where a citation allows only one source, cite the General Court — every page here links to what it is drawn from. The date below is the day the page was read.

MLA
“CACR 15 (2002): relating to a balanced budget. Providing that the governor shall not propose, nor shall the general court approve, an operating budget in which expenditures exceed estimated revenue.” Granite Record, https://graniterecord.org/bill/2002/cacr15. Accessed 24 Oct. 2026.
APA
Granite Record. (n.d.). CACR 15 (2002): relating to a balanced budget. Providing that the governor shall not propose, nor shall the general court approve, an operating budget in which expenditures exceed estimated revenue. Retrieved 24 Oct. 2026, from https://graniterecord.org/bill/2002/cacr15
Chicago
Granite Record. “CACR 15 (2002): relating to a balanced budget. Providing that the governor shall not propose, nor shall the general court approve, an operating budget in which expenditures exceed estimated revenue.” Accessed 24 Oct. 2026. https://graniterecord.org/bill/2002/cacr15.
BibTeX
@misc{bill-2002-cacr15, title = {CACR 15 (2002): relating to a balanced budget. Providing that the governor shall not propose, nor shall the general court approve, an operating budget in which expenditures exceed estimated revenue.}, howpublished = {Granite Record}, url = {https://graniterecord.org/bill/2002/cacr15}, note = {Accessed 24 Oct. 2026} }

CACR 15 (2002)

relating to a balanced budget. Providing that the governor shall not propose, nor shall the general court approve, an operating budget in which expenditures exceed estimated revenue.

  • Status: Killed
  • Term: 2001-2002
  • House committee: Finance
  • Subject: Miscellaneous

The Story

It was introduced on January 25, 2001 and referred to the House Finance committee. The committee held a public hearing on February 13, 2001. The committee held work sessions on February 14, 2001 and March 21, 2001. The committee retained the bill, holding it for further work rather than reporting it out this year. The committee held work sessions on October 3, 2001 and October 17, 2001. The majority of the committee recommended that the House kill it. On January 10, 2002 the House voted to kill it on a voice vote.

Sponsors

Hearings and Sessions

  • February 13, 2001, 10:30 AM: hearing, House Finance, RMs210-211,LOB
  • February 14, 2001, 3:00 PM: subcommittee work session, House Finance, RMs210-211,LOB (Rep Kurk)
  • March 21, 2001, 2:00 PM: subcommittee work session, House Finance, RMs210-211,LOB
  • October 3, 2001, 9:30 AM: subcommittee work session, House Finance, RMs210-211, LOB

Votes

  • January 10, 2002, House: Inexpedient to Legislate — voice vote, passed

The Docket

  • January 25, 2001: Introduced and ref to Finance; HJ18, p252
  • February 13, 2001: Hearing Feb 13 10:30 RMs210-211,LOB
  • February 14, 2001: Fin Div IV Subcom Work Session Feb 14 3:00 RMs210-211,LOB (Rep Kurk)
  • March 21, 2001: Fin Div IV Subcom Work & Exec Session Mar 21 2:00 RMs210-211,LOB
  • April 12, 2001: Retained in Committee
  • October 3, 2001: Fin Div IV Subcom Work & Exec Session Oct 3 9:30 RMs210-211, LOB
  • October 17, 2001: Fin Div IV Subcom work & exec session Oct 17 & 29 10:00 RMS210-211,LOB
  • December 3, 2001: Maj Report ITL for Jan 10 (vote: 15-4;Reg)
  • January 10, 2002: ITL Report Adopted VV; HJ7, p298

Laws It Would Change

From the General Court