HB 52 (2000): exempting certain currants and gooseberries resistant to the white pine blister rust organism from restrictions on planting in control areas.

Cite this page

Granite Record indexes the General Court’s record; it is not that record. Where a citation allows only one source, cite the General Court — every page here links to what it is drawn from. The date below is the day the page was read.

MLA
“HB 52 (2000): exempting certain currants and gooseberries resistant to the white pine blister rust organism from restrictions on planting in control areas.” Granite Record, https://graniterecord.org/bill/2000/hb52. Accessed 24 Oct. 2026.
APA
Granite Record. (n.d.). HB 52 (2000): exempting certain currants and gooseberries resistant to the white pine blister rust organism from restrictions on planting in control areas. Retrieved 24 Oct. 2026, from https://graniterecord.org/bill/2000/hb52
Chicago
Granite Record. “HB 52 (2000): exempting certain currants and gooseberries resistant to the white pine blister rust organism from restrictions on planting in control areas.” Accessed 24 Oct. 2026. https://graniterecord.org/bill/2000/hb52.
BibTeX
@misc{bill-2000-hb52, title = {HB 52 (2000): exempting certain currants and gooseberries resistant to the white pine blister rust organism from restrictions on planting in control areas.}, howpublished = {Granite Record}, url = {https://graniterecord.org/bill/2000/hb52}, note = {Accessed 24 Oct. 2026} }

HB 52 (2000)

exempting certain currants and gooseberries resistant to the white pine blister rust organism from restrictions on planting in control areas.

  • Status: Killed
  • Term: 1999-2000
  • House committee: Environment and Agriculture
  • Subject: Miscellaneous

The Story

It was introduced on January 6, 1999 and referred to the House Environment and Agriculture committee. The committee held a public hearing on February 2, 1999. The committee held a work session on March 3, 1999. The majority of the committee recommended that the House send it back to committee unanimously, 19–0, and the report was placed on the consent calendar. On March 18, 1999 the bill was referred to the Environment and Agriculture committee. The committee held a work session on September 9, 1999. The majority of the committee recommended that the House kill it unanimously, 15–0, and the report was placed on the consent calendar. On January 5, 2000 the House voted to kill it.

Sponsors

Hearings and Sessions

  • February 2, 1999, 11:00 AM: hearing, House Environment and Agriculture, Rm303,LOB
  • March 3, 1999, 9:00 AM: subcommittee work session, House Environment and Agriculture, Rm303,LOB {Note time change}
  • September 9, 1999, 10:00 AM: subcommittee work session, House Environment and Agriculture, Rm307,LOB NOTE ROOM CHANGE

The Docket

  • January 6, 1999: Introduced and ref to Env & Agric; HJ10, p125
  • January 12, 1999: Copy to Chairman on 1/12/99 due on
  • February 2, 1999: Hearing Feb 02 11:00 Rm303,LOB
  • March 3, 1999: Subcom work session Mar 3 9:00 Rm303,LOB {Note time change}
  • March 4, 1999: Maj Report RE-REF for Mar 18 (Vote 19-0;CC)
  • March 18, 1999: Re-referred to Env & Agric committee; HJ29, p602
  • July 12, 1999: (Re-Ref Subcom: Reps Marshall, McRae, L Pratt, Meader & Owen)
  • September 9, 1999: Re-Ref Subcom work session Sep 9 10:00 Rm307,LOB NOTE ROOM CHANGE
  • January 5, 2000: RE-REF Maj Report ITL for 1/5/2000 (vote 15-0;CC)
  • January 5, 2000: ITL Report Adopted; HJ5, p114

Laws It Would Change

From the General Court