HB 209 (2000): relative to authorizing the consideration of traditional village patterns in local zoning ordinances.

Cite this page

Granite Record indexes the General Court’s record; it is not that record. Where a citation allows only one source, cite the General Court — every page here links to what it is drawn from. The date below is the day the page was read.

MLA
“HB 209 (2000): relative to authorizing the consideration of traditional village patterns in local zoning ordinances.” Granite Record, https://graniterecord.org/bill/2000/hb209. Accessed 24 Oct. 2026.
APA
Granite Record. (n.d.). HB 209 (2000): relative to authorizing the consideration of traditional village patterns in local zoning ordinances. Retrieved 24 Oct. 2026, from https://graniterecord.org/bill/2000/hb209
Chicago
Granite Record. “HB 209 (2000): relative to authorizing the consideration of traditional village patterns in local zoning ordinances.” Accessed 24 Oct. 2026. https://graniterecord.org/bill/2000/hb209.
BibTeX
@misc{bill-2000-hb209, title = {HB 209 (2000): relative to authorizing the consideration of traditional village patterns in local zoning ordinances.}, howpublished = {Granite Record}, url = {https://graniterecord.org/bill/2000/hb209}, note = {Accessed 24 Oct. 2026} }

HB 209 (2000)

relative to authorizing the consideration of traditional village patterns in local zoning ordinances.

  • Status: Killed
  • Term: 1999-2000
  • House committee: Municipal and County Government
  • Subject: Zoning and Planning

The Story

It was introduced on January 6, 1999 and referred to the House Municipal and County Government committee. The committee held a public hearing on January 13, 1999. The committee held work sessions on February 11, 1999 and March 8, 1999. The majority of the committee recommended that the House send it back to committee unanimously, 14–0, and the report was placed on the consent calendar. On March 30, 1999 the bill was referred to the Municipal and County Government committee. The committee held a work session on August 11, 1999. The majority of the committee recommended that the House kill it unanimously, 14–0, and the report was placed on the consent calendar. On January 5, 2000 the House voted to kill it.

Sponsors

Hearings and Sessions

  • January 13, 1999, 11:00 AM: hearing, House Municipal and County Government, Rm 301,LOB
  • February 11, 1999, 1:30 PM: full committee work session, House Municipal and County Government, Rm301,LOB
  • March 8, 1999, 10:30 AM: subcommittee work session, House Municipal and County Government, Rm301,LOB

The Docket

  • January 6, 1999: Introduced and ref to Mun & Cnty Govt; HJ10, p127
  • January 7, 1999: Copy to Chairman on 01/05/99 due on
  • January 13, 1999: Hearing Jan 13 11:00 Rm 301,LOB
  • February 11, 1999: Full Comm work session Feb 11 1:30 Rm301,LOB
  • March 8, 1999: Subcom work session Mar 8 10:30 Rm301,LOB
  • March 24, 1999: Maj Report RE-REF for Mar 30 (vote 14-0;CC)
  • March 30, 1999: Re-Referred to Mun & Cnty Govt committee; HJ36, p752
  • August 3, 1999: (Re-Ref Subcom: Reps Brundige, Hager, McGuirk, Noyes, Salatiello & Simon)
  • August 11, 1999: Re-Ref Subcom work sessions Aug 11 & 18 11:00 Rm301,LOB
  • August 18, 1999: Re-Ref Subcom work sessions Aut 25 & Sep 1 11:00 Rm301,LOB
  • January 5, 2000: RE-REF Maj Report ITL for 1/5/2000 (vote 14-0;CC)
  • January 5, 2000: ITL Report Adopted; HJ5, p118

Laws It Would Change

From the General Court