HB 1328 (2000): requiring that the rules of evidence shall apply in divorce proceedings.
Cite this page
Granite Record indexes the General Court’s record; it is not that record. Where a citation allows only one source, cite the General Court — every page here links to what it is drawn from. The date below is the day the page was read.
- MLA
- “HB 1328 (2000): requiring that the rules of evidence shall apply in divorce proceedings.” Granite Record, https://graniterecord.org/bill/2000/hb1328. Accessed 24 Oct. 2026.
- APA
- Granite Record. (n.d.). HB 1328 (2000): requiring that the rules of evidence shall apply in divorce proceedings. Retrieved 24 Oct. 2026, from https://graniterecord.org/bill/2000/hb1328
- Chicago
- Granite Record. “HB 1328 (2000): requiring that the rules of evidence shall apply in divorce proceedings.” Accessed 24 Oct. 2026. https://graniterecord.org/bill/2000/hb1328.
- BibTeX
@misc{bill-2000-hb1328, title = {HB 1328 (2000): requiring that the rules of evidence shall apply in divorce proceedings.}, howpublished = {Granite Record}, url = {https://graniterecord.org/bill/2000/hb1328}, note = {Accessed 24 Oct. 2026} }
HB 1328 (2000)
requiring that the rules of evidence shall apply in divorce proceedings.
- Status: Killed
- Term: 1999-2000
- House committee: Judiciary
- Subject: Domestic Relations
The Story
It was introduced on January 5, 2000 and referred to the House Judiciary committee. The committee held a public hearing on January 26, 2000. The majority of the committee recommended that the House kill it by a vote of 13–1, and the report was placed on the consent calendar. On March 9, 2000 the House voted to kill it.
Sponsors
- Rep. Gary Gilmore (D - Straf 11) (prime sponsor)
Hearings and Sessions
- January 26, 2000, 1:30 PM: hearing, House Judiciary, RM208,LOB
The Docket
- January 5, 2000: Introduced and ref to Judiciary; HJ5, p95
- January 5, 2000: Copy to Chairman on 12/22/1999
- January 26, 2000: Hearing Jan 26 1:30 RM208,LOB
- February 23, 2000: Maj Report ITL for Mar 9 (vote 13-1;CC)
- March 9, 2000: ITL Report Adopted (Cons Cal by 2/3VV); HJ22, p627