CACR 30 (2000): relating to judicial retirement. Providing that a judge may serve after age 70 if appointed by governor and council to a 5-year renewable term.

Cite this page

Granite Record indexes the General Court’s record; it is not that record. Where a citation allows only one source, cite the General Court — every page here links to what it is drawn from. The date below is the day the page was read.

MLA
“CACR 30 (2000): relating to judicial retirement. Providing that a judge may serve after age 70 if appointed by governor and council to a 5-year renewable term.” Granite Record, https://graniterecord.org/bill/2000/cacr30. Accessed 24 Oct. 2026.
APA
Granite Record. (n.d.). CACR 30 (2000): relating to judicial retirement. Providing that a judge may serve after age 70 if appointed by governor and council to a 5-year renewable term. Retrieved 24 Oct. 2026, from https://graniterecord.org/bill/2000/cacr30
Chicago
Granite Record. “CACR 30 (2000): relating to judicial retirement. Providing that a judge may serve after age 70 if appointed by governor and council to a 5-year renewable term.” Accessed 24 Oct. 2026. https://graniterecord.org/bill/2000/cacr30.
BibTeX
@misc{bill-2000-cacr30, title = {CACR 30 (2000): relating to judicial retirement. Providing that a judge may serve after age 70 if appointed by governor and council to a 5-year renewable term.}, howpublished = {Granite Record}, url = {https://graniterecord.org/bill/2000/cacr30}, note = {Accessed 24 Oct. 2026} }

CACR 30 (2000)

relating to judicial retirement. Providing that a judge may serve after age 70 if appointed by governor and council to a 5-year renewable term.

  • Status: Killed
  • Term: 1999-2000
  • House committee: Judiciary
  • Subject: Constitutional Amendments

The Story

It was introduced on January 5, 2000 and referred to the House Judiciary committee. The committee held a public hearing on February 8, 2000. The majority of the committee recommended that the House pass it by a vote of 10–6. On March 9, 2000 the House adopted “Special Order to Mar 23” on a voice vote. On March 23, 2000 the House voted to kill it on a voice vote.

Sponsors

Hearings and Sessions

  • February 8, 2000, 10:00 AM: hearing, House Judiciary, RM208,LOB

Votes

  • March 9, 2000, House: Special Order to Mar 23 — voice vote, passed
  • March 23, 2000, House: Inexpedient to Legislate — voice vote, passed
  • March 23, 2000, House: COMMITTEE REPORT: ADOPTION — yeas 162, nays 196, failed

The Docket

  • January 5, 2000: Introduced and ref to Judiciary; HJ5, p106
  • January 5, 2000: Copy to Chairman on 12/22/1999
  • February 8, 2000: Hearing Feb 8 10:00 RM208,LOB
  • February 22, 2000: Maj Report OTP for Mar 9 (vote 10-6;Reg)
  • March 9, 2000: Special Order to Mar 23, Rep Mock MA VV; HJ22, p648
  • March 23, 2000: OTP ML RC(162-196); Rep Mock moved ITL, ITL Report Adopted VV; HJ26, p834-836

Laws It Would Change

From the General Court