SB 526 (1996): revising the commission on the status of the family.

Cite this page

Granite Record indexes the General Court’s record; it is not that record. Where a citation allows only one source, cite the General Court — every page here links to what it is drawn from. The date below is the day the page was read.

MLA
“SB 526 (1996): revising the commission on the status of the family.” Granite Record, https://graniterecord.org/bill/1996/sb526. Accessed 24 Oct. 2026.
APA
Granite Record. (n.d.). SB 526 (1996): revising the commission on the status of the family. Retrieved 24 Oct. 2026, from https://graniterecord.org/bill/1996/sb526
Chicago
Granite Record. “SB 526 (1996): revising the commission on the status of the family.” Accessed 24 Oct. 2026. https://graniterecord.org/bill/1996/sb526.
BibTeX
@misc{bill-1996-sb526, title = {SB 526 (1996): revising the commission on the status of the family.}, howpublished = {Granite Record}, url = {https://graniterecord.org/bill/1996/sb526}, note = {Accessed 24 Oct. 2026} }

SB 526 (1996)

revising the commission on the status of the family.

  • Status: Referred for interim study
  • Term: 1995-1996
  • House committee: Judiciary and Family Law
  • Senate committee: Executive Departments and Administration
  • Subject: Miscellaneous

The Story

It was introduced on January 3, 1996 and referred to the Senate Executive Departments and Administration committee. The committee held a public hearing on January 25, 1996. The committee voted unanimously, 3–0, to recommend that the Senate pass it with changes. On February 1, 1996 the Senate voted to pass it with changes on a voice vote. It crossed to the House on February 13, 1996 and was referred to the House Judiciary and Family Law committee. The committee held a public hearing on March 14, 1996. The committee held a work session on April 2, 1996. The majority of the committee recommended that the House study it after the session ends by a vote of 14–1, and the report was placed on the consent calendar. On April 17, 1996 the House voted to study it after the session ends. The committee held work sessions on July 31, 1996 and August 7, 1996. The committee reported back on its interim study of the bill: “Not Recommended for Future Legislation”, by a vote of 11 to 0.

Sponsors

  • Sen. Colantuono (SD14) (prime sponsor)

Hearings and Sessions

  • January 25, 1996, 1:00 PM: hearing, Senate Executive Departments and Administration, RM104,LOB
  • March 14, 1996, 11:30 AM: hearing, House Judiciary and Family Law, RM208,LOB
  • April 2, 1996, 10:00 AM: subcommittee work session, House Judiciary and Family Law, RM208,LOB
  • July 31, 1996, 10:00 AM: subcommittee work session, House Judiciary and Family Law, RM103,SH :JUDICIARY
  • August 7, 1996, 10:00 AM: subcommittee work session, House Judiciary and Family Law, RM208,LOB :JUDICIARY

Votes

  • February 1, 1996, Senate: Ought to Pass with Amendment — voice vote, passed

The Docket

  • January 3, 1996: INTRODUCED AND REF TO EXEC DEPTS+ADMIN; SJ1,P3
  • January 25, 1996: HEARING JAN25 01:00 RM104,LOB FOR: ED+A
  • January 31, 1996: COMM REPORT OTP/AM FEB01 (VOTE 3-0)
  • January 31, 1996: PROP COMM AM<4511>; SC6,P3
  • February 1, 1996: COMM AM, AA VV; SEN J KING FL AM<4618>(NEW TITLE), AA VV; PASSED WITH AM VV; SJ5,P62 + 66
  • February 13, 1996: INTRODUCED AND REF TO JUDICIARY & F L; HJ25,P804
  • February 13, 1996: COPY TO CHAIRMAN ON 02/13/96 DUE ON 04/11/96
  • March 14, 1996: HEARING MAR14 11:30 RM208,LOB FOR: JUDICIARY
  • March 26, 1996: (SUBCOM CHR: REP J BROWN)
  • April 2, 1996: SUBCOM WORK SESSION APR02 10:00 RM208,LOB FOR: JUD
  • April 11, 1996: MAJ REPORT REF FOR STUDY FOR APR17 (VOTE 14-1;CC)
  • April 17, 1996: REFERRED TO JUDICIARY & F L FOR INTERIM STUDY; HJ54,P1778
  • April 25, 1996: (SUBCOM REPS: J BROWN, I PRATT, BARRY, HALLYBURTON, L JOHNSON, MAYHEW, MITTELMAN, RICHARDSON & ALLISON)
  • July 31, 1996: INT STUDY SUBCOM WK SESS JULY31 10:00 RM103,SH :JUDICIARY
  • August 7, 1996: INT STUDY SUBCOM WK SESS AUG07 10:00 RM208,LOB :JUDICIARY
  • October 24, 1996: INT STUDY REPT: NOT REC FOR LEG IN 1997 (VOTE 11-0)

Laws It Would Change

From the General Court