HB 1337-FN (1996): repealing the fee for recording plans and specifications for sewage and waste disposal systems.

Cite this page

Granite Record indexes the General Court’s record; it is not that record. Where a citation allows only one source, cite the General Court — every page here links to what it is drawn from. The date below is the day the page was read.

MLA
“HB 1337-FN (1996): repealing the fee for recording plans and specifications for sewage and waste disposal systems.” Granite Record, https://graniterecord.org/bill/1996/hb1337. Accessed 24 Oct. 2026.
APA
Granite Record. (n.d.). HB 1337-FN (1996): repealing the fee for recording plans and specifications for sewage and waste disposal systems. Retrieved 24 Oct. 2026, from https://graniterecord.org/bill/1996/hb1337
Chicago
Granite Record. “HB 1337-FN (1996): repealing the fee for recording plans and specifications for sewage and waste disposal systems.” Accessed 24 Oct. 2026. https://graniterecord.org/bill/1996/hb1337.
BibTeX
@misc{bill-1996-hb1337, title = {HB 1337-FN (1996): repealing the fee for recording plans and specifications for sewage and waste disposal systems.}, howpublished = {Granite Record}, url = {https://graniterecord.org/bill/1996/hb1337}, note = {Accessed 24 Oct. 2026} }

HB 1337-FN (1996)

repealing the fee for recording plans and specifications for sewage and waste disposal systems.

  • Status: Referred for interim study
  • Term: 1995-1996
  • House committee: Resources, Recreation and Development
  • Subject: Environment - Administration

The Story

It was introduced on January 3, 1996 and referred to the House Resources, Recreation and Development committee. The committee held a public hearing on January 23, 1996. The majority of the committee recommended that the House study it after the session ends unanimously, 20–0, and the report was placed on the consent calendar. The bill was taken off the consent calendar on February 13, 1996. On February 13, 1996 the House adopted “Special Order to 02/15/1996”. On February 15, 1996 the House adopted “Recommit” on a voice vote. The majority of the committee recommended that the House study it after the session ends unanimously, 20–0, and the report was placed on the consent calendar. On March 5, 1996 the House adopted “Suspend Rules to consider after deadline”, on a motion by Rep. A Torr & Buckley. On March 5, 1996 the House voted to study it after the session ends. The committee held a work session on October 1, 1996. The committee reported back on its interim study of the bill: “Not Recommended for Future Legislation”, by a vote of 15 to 0.

Sponsors

  • Rep. Camm (Rock 15) (prime sponsor)
  • Rep. Musler (Straf 6)

Hearings and Sessions

  • January 23, 1996, 10:00 AM: hearing, House Resources, Recreation and Development, RM301,LOB
  • October 1, 1996, 10:00 AM: subcommittee work session, House Resources, Recreation and Development, RM301,LOB :RR&D

Votes

  • February 15, 1996, House: Recommit — voice vote, passed

The Docket

  • January 3, 1996: INTRODUCED AND REF TO RES, REC & DEV; HJ4,P131
  • January 3, 1996: COPY TO CHAIRMAN ON 12/12/95 DUE ON 02/07/96
  • January 23, 1996: HEARING JAN23 10:00 RM301,LOB FOR: RR&D
  • February 1, 1996: MAJ REPORT REF FOR STUDY FOR FEB13 (VOTE 20-0;CC)
  • February 13, 1996: REMOVED FROM CONS CAL, REQ REP CAMM; HJ25,P805
  • February 13, 1996: SPECIAL ORDER TO FEB15, WITHOUT OBJECTION; HJ25,P820
  • February 15, 1996: RECOMMITTED TO RES, REC & DEV, REP DICKINSON MA VV; HJ27,P955
  • February 15, 1996: //CANCELLED//HEARING ON PROP AM FEB22 09:30 RM301,LOB FOR: RR&
  • February 21, 1996: MAJ REPORT REF FOR STUDY FOR MAR05 (VOTE 20-0;CC)
  • March 5, 1996: REPS A TORR & BUCKLEY SUSP RULES TO CONSIDER AFTER DEADLINE, MA VV; HJ34,P1264
  • March 5, 1996: REFERRED TO RES, REC & DEV FOR INTERIM STUDY; HJ34,P1255
  • June 5, 1996: [INT STUDY SUBCOM: REPS ADLER, ROYCE, WHALLEY, KIRBY, CLAY, ACKERMAN & FEUERSTEIN]
  • October 1, 1996: INT STUDY SUBCOM WORK SESSION OCT01 10:00 RM301,LOB :RR&D
  • October 30, 1996: INT STUDY REPT: NOT REC FOR LEGIS IN 1997 (VOTE 15-0)

Laws It Would Change

From the General Court