SB 708-FN (1994): permitting the aquaculture of oysters and the use of live bait for the purpose of taking fish on Lake Sunapee.

Cite this page

Granite Record indexes the General Court’s record; it is not that record. Where a citation allows only one source, cite the General Court — every page here links to what it is drawn from. The date below is the day the page was read.

MLA
“SB 708-FN (1994): permitting the aquaculture of oysters and the use of live bait for the purpose of taking fish on Lake Sunapee.” Granite Record, https://graniterecord.org/bill/1994/sb708. Accessed 24 Oct. 2026.
APA
Granite Record. (n.d.). SB 708-FN (1994): permitting the aquaculture of oysters and the use of live bait for the purpose of taking fish on Lake Sunapee. Retrieved 24 Oct. 2026, from https://graniterecord.org/bill/1994/sb708
Chicago
Granite Record. “SB 708-FN (1994): permitting the aquaculture of oysters and the use of live bait for the purpose of taking fish on Lake Sunapee.” Accessed 24 Oct. 2026. https://graniterecord.org/bill/1994/sb708.
BibTeX
@misc{bill-1994-sb708, title = {SB 708-FN (1994): permitting the aquaculture of oysters and the use of live bait for the purpose of taking fish on Lake Sunapee.}, howpublished = {Granite Record}, url = {https://graniterecord.org/bill/1994/sb708}, note = {Accessed 24 Oct. 2026} }

SB 708-FN (1994)

permitting the aquaculture of oysters and the use of live bait for the purpose of taking fish on Lake Sunapee.

  • Status: Killed
  • Term: 1993-1994
  • House committee: Wildlife and Marine Resources
  • Senate committee: Environment
  • Subject: Fish & Game

The Story

It was introduced on January 5, 1994 and referred to the Senate Environment committee. The committee held a public hearing on January 27, 1994. The committee recommended that the Senate pass it with changes. On February 15, 1994 the Senate voted to pass it with changes on a division vote, then referred it on to the Senate Fin committee. On February 15, 1994 the Senate adopted “Third Reading” on a voice vote. It crossed to the House on February 17, 1994 and was referred to the House Wildlife and Marine Resources committee. The committee held a public hearing on March 2, 1994. The majority of the committee recommended that the House kill it unanimously, 12–0, and the report was placed on the consent calendar. The bill was taken off the consent calendar on April 19, 1994. On April 19, 1994 the House adopted “Recommit” on a voice vote. The majority of the committee recommended that the House kill it unanimously, 10–0, and the report was placed on the consent calendar. On May 5, 1994 the House voted to kill it.

Sponsors

  • Sen. Cohen (SD24) (prime sponsor)

Hearings and Sessions

  • January 27, 1994, 10:50 AM: hearing, Senate Environment, RM212,LOB
  • March 2, 1994, 11:00 AM: hearing, House Wildlife and Marine Resources, RM307,LOB

Votes

  • February 15, 1994, Senate: Ought to Pass with Amendment — division vote, passed
  • February 15, 1994, Senate: Third Reading — voice vote, passed
  • April 19, 1994, House: Recommit — voice vote, passed

The Docket

  • January 5, 1994: INTRODUCED AND REF TO ENVIRONMENT; SJ1,P19
  • January 27, 1994: HEARING JAN27 10:50 RM212,LOB FOR: ENVIRONMENT
  • February 14, 1994: COMM REPORT OTP/AM FEB15
  • February 14, 1994: PROP COMM AM<5048>(NEW TITLE); SC10,P6
  • February 15, 1994: COMM AM<5048>, AA VV; SEN CURRIER FL AM<5196>(NEW TITLE), AA VV; PASSED WITH AM AND REF TO FIN DIV; SJ6,P128-129
  • February 15, 1994: SEN BLAISDELL MOVED TO RECONSIDER REF TO FIN, MA VV; 3RD READING MA VV; SJ6,P137 + 138
  • February 17, 1994: INTRODUCED AND REF TO WILDLIFE; HJ29,P852
  • February 17, 1994: IN SEAT POCKET ON 02/17/94 DUE ON 04/28/94
  • March 2, 1994: HEARING MAR02 11:00 RM307,LOB FOR: WILDLIFE
  • April 13, 1994: MAJ REPORT ITL FOR APR19 (VOTE 12-0;CC)
  • April 19, 1994: REMOVED FROM CONS CAL, REQ REP FELCH; HJ53,P1700
  • April 19, 1994: RECOMMITTED TO WILDLIFE, REP FELCH MA VV; HJ53,P1731
  • April 28, 1994: MAJ REPORT ITL FOR MAY05 (VOTE 10-0;CC)
  • May 5, 1994: ITL REPORT ADOPTED; HJ61,P1954

Laws It Would Change

From the General Court