HB 496 (1994): making ownership of a pharmacy by certain medical professionals grounds for pharmacy permit suspension or revocation.

Cite this page

Granite Record indexes the General Court’s record; it is not that record. Where a citation allows only one source, cite the General Court — every page here links to what it is drawn from. The date below is the day the page was read.

MLA
“HB 496 (1994): making ownership of a pharmacy by certain medical professionals grounds for pharmacy permit suspension or revocation.” Granite Record, https://graniterecord.org/bill/1994/hb496. Accessed 24 Oct. 2026.
APA
Granite Record. (n.d.). HB 496 (1994): making ownership of a pharmacy by certain medical professionals grounds for pharmacy permit suspension or revocation. Retrieved 24 Oct. 2026, from https://graniterecord.org/bill/1994/hb496
Chicago
Granite Record. “HB 496 (1994): making ownership of a pharmacy by certain medical professionals grounds for pharmacy permit suspension or revocation.” Accessed 24 Oct. 2026. https://graniterecord.org/bill/1994/hb496.
BibTeX
@misc{bill-1994-hb496, title = {HB 496 (1994): making ownership of a pharmacy by certain medical professionals grounds for pharmacy permit suspension or revocation.}, howpublished = {Granite Record}, url = {https://graniterecord.org/bill/1994/hb496}, note = {Accessed 24 Oct. 2026} }

HB 496 (1994)

making ownership of a pharmacy by certain medical professionals grounds for pharmacy permit suspension or revocation.

  • Status: Killed
  • Term: 1993-1994
  • House committee: Commerce, Small Business and Consumer Affairs
  • Subject: Miscellaneous

The Story

It was introduced on January 6, 1993 and referred to the House Commerce, Small Business and Consumer Affairs committee. The committee held a public hearing on January 26, 1993. The committee held a work session on February 18, 1993. The majority of the committee recommended that the House send it back to committee unanimously, 15–0, and the report was placed on the consent calendar. The bill was taken off the consent calendar on March 10, 1993. On March 10, 1993 the House adopted “Special Order to 03/11/1993”. On March 11, 1993 the House adopted “Special Order to 03/16/1993”. On March 16, 1993 the bill was referred to the Commerce, Small Business and Consumer Affairs committee. The majority of the committee recommended that the House kill it unanimously, 16–0, and the report was placed on the consent calendar. On January 5, 1994 the House voted to kill it.

Sponsors

  • Rep. Conroy (Rock 13) (prime sponsor)

Hearings and Sessions

  • January 26, 1993, 9:30 AM: hearing, House Commerce, Small Business and Consumer Affairs, RM207,LOB
  • February 18, 1993, 10:00 AM: subcommittee work session, House Commerce, Small Business and Consumer Affairs, RM207,LOB

The Docket

  • January 6, 1993: INTRODUCED AND REF TO COMMERCE; HJ8,P121
  • January 6, 1993: IN SEAT POCKET ON 01/06/93 DUE ON 02/10/93
  • January 26, 1993: HEARING JAN26 09:30 RM207,LOB FOR: COMMERCE
  • February 11, 1993: 21 CAL DAY EXTENSION GRANTED (NEW DUE 03/03/93); HJ22,P427
  • February 18, 1993: SUBCOM WORK SESSION FEB18 10:00 RM207,LOB FOR: COMMERCE
  • March 4, 1993: MAJ REPORT RE-REF FOR MAR10 (VOTE 15-0;CC)
  • March 10, 1993: REMOVED FROM CONS CAL, REQ REP PHILBROOK; HJ36,P856
  • March 10, 1993: SPECIAL ORDER TO MAR11; HJ36,P885
  • March 11, 1993: SPECIAL ORDER TO MAR16; HJ37,P905
  • March 16, 1993: RETURNED TO CONSENT CALENDAR, REP PHILBROOK; HJ40,P958
  • March 16, 1993: RE-REFERRED TO COMMERCE; HJ40,P960
  • October 21, 1993: RE-REF MAJ REPORT ITL FOR 01/05/94 (VOTE 16-0;CC)
  • January 5, 1994: ITL REPORT ADOPTED; HJ7,P206

Laws It Would Change

From the General Court