HB 1344 (1994): requiring financial institutions which sell notes to disclose the sale price of the note to the debtor and any obligor on the note, upon request.

Cite this page

Granite Record indexes the General Court’s record; it is not that record. Where a citation allows only one source, cite the General Court — every page here links to what it is drawn from. The date below is the day the page was read.

MLA
“HB 1344 (1994): requiring financial institutions which sell notes to disclose the sale price of the note to the debtor and any obligor on the note, upon request.” Granite Record, https://graniterecord.org/bill/1994/hb1344. Accessed 24 Oct. 2026.
APA
Granite Record. (n.d.). HB 1344 (1994): requiring financial institutions which sell notes to disclose the sale price of the note to the debtor and any obligor on the note, upon request. Retrieved 24 Oct. 2026, from https://graniterecord.org/bill/1994/hb1344
Chicago
Granite Record. “HB 1344 (1994): requiring financial institutions which sell notes to disclose the sale price of the note to the debtor and any obligor on the note, upon request.” Accessed 24 Oct. 2026. https://graniterecord.org/bill/1994/hb1344.
BibTeX
@misc{bill-1994-hb1344, title = {HB 1344 (1994): requiring financial institutions which sell notes to disclose the sale price of the note to the debtor and any obligor on the note, upon request.}, howpublished = {Granite Record}, url = {https://graniterecord.org/bill/1994/hb1344}, note = {Accessed 24 Oct. 2026} }

HB 1344 (1994)

requiring financial institutions which sell notes to disclose the sale price of the note to the debtor and any obligor on the note, upon request.

  • Status: Killed
  • Term: 1993-1994
  • House committee: Commerce, Small Business and Consumer Affairs
  • Subject: Miscellaneous

The Story

It was introduced on January 5, 1994 and referred to the House Commerce, Small Business and Consumer Affairs committee. The committee held a public hearing on January 20, 1994. The committee held a work session on February 2, 1994. The majority of the committee recommended that the House kill it by a vote of 14–1, and the report was placed on the consent calendar. On February 8, 1994 the House voted to kill it.

Sponsors

  • Rep. Braiterman (Merr 3) (prime sponsor)
  • Rep. Burling (Sull 1)

Hearings and Sessions

  • January 20, 1994, 11:00 AM: hearing, House Commerce, Small Business and Consumer Affairs, RM207,LOB
  • February 2, 1994, 9:00 AM: subcommittee work session, House Commerce, Small Business and Consumer Affairs, RM207,LOB

The Docket

  • January 5, 1994: INTRODUCED AND REF TO COMMERCE; HJ7,P189
  • January 5, 1994: IN SEAT POCKET ON 01/05/94; DUE ON 03/10/94
  • January 20, 1994: HEARING JAN20 11:00 RM207,LOB FOR: COMMERCE
  • February 2, 1994: SUBCOM WORK SESSION FEB02 09:00 RM207,LOB FOR: COMMERCE
  • February 2, 1994: MAJ REPORT ITL FOR FEB08 (VOTE 14-1;CC)
  • February 8, 1994: ITL REPORT ADOPTED; HJ19,P551

Laws It Would Change

From the General Court