HB 1159 (1994): requiring manufactured housing park owners to compensate residents for relocation costs due to change in land use of the park.

Cite this page

Granite Record indexes the General Court’s record; it is not that record. Where a citation allows only one source, cite the General Court — every page here links to what it is drawn from. The date below is the day the page was read.

MLA
“HB 1159 (1994): requiring manufactured housing park owners to compensate residents for relocation costs due to change in land use of the park.” Granite Record, https://graniterecord.org/bill/1994/hb1159. Accessed 24 Oct. 2026.
APA
Granite Record. (n.d.). HB 1159 (1994): requiring manufactured housing park owners to compensate residents for relocation costs due to change in land use of the park. Retrieved 24 Oct. 2026, from https://graniterecord.org/bill/1994/hb1159
Chicago
Granite Record. “HB 1159 (1994): requiring manufactured housing park owners to compensate residents for relocation costs due to change in land use of the park.” Accessed 24 Oct. 2026. https://graniterecord.org/bill/1994/hb1159.
BibTeX
@misc{bill-1994-hb1159, title = {HB 1159 (1994): requiring manufactured housing park owners to compensate residents for relocation costs due to change in land use of the park.}, howpublished = {Granite Record}, url = {https://graniterecord.org/bill/1994/hb1159}, note = {Accessed 24 Oct. 2026} }

HB 1159 (1994)

requiring manufactured housing park owners to compensate residents for relocation costs due to change in land use of the park.

  • Status: Referred for interim study
  • Term: 1993-1994
  • House committee: Commerce, Small Business and Consumer Affairs
  • Senate committee: Public Affairs
  • Subject: Housing

The Story

It was introduced on January 5, 1994 and referred to the House Commerce, Small Business and Consumer Affairs committee. The committee held a public hearing on January 11, 1994. The committee held work sessions on January 25, 1994 and February 10, 1994. The majority of the committee recommended that the House pass it with changes by a vote of 12–1, and the report was placed on the consent calendar. On March 15, 1994 the House voted to pass it with changes. It crossed to the Senate on March 24, 1994 and was referred to the Senate Public Affairs committee. The committee held a public hearing on April 13, 1994. The committee recommended that the Senate study it after the session ends. On April 21, 1994 the Senate voted to study it after the session ends on a voice vote.

Sponsors

  • Rep. Hurst (Rock 22) (prime sponsor)

Hearings and Sessions

  • January 11, 1994, 10:30 AM: hearing, House Commerce, Small Business and Consumer Affairs, RM207,LOB
  • January 25, 1994, 2:00 PM: subcommittee work session, House Commerce, Small Business and Consumer Affairs, RM207,LOB
  • February 10, 1994, 1:00 PM: subcommittee work session, RM207,LOB :COMMERCE
  • April 13, 1994, 1:00 PM: hearing, Senate Public Affairs, RM212,LOB

Votes

  • April 21, 1994, Senate: Refer for Interim Study — voice vote, passed

The Docket

  • January 5, 1994: INTRODUCED AND REF TO COMMERCE; HJ7,P181
  • January 5, 1994: IN SEAT POCKET ON 01/05/94; DUE ON 03/10/94
  • January 11, 1994: HEARING JAN11 10:30 RM207,LOB FOR: COMMERCE
  • January 12, 1994: //CANCELLED//SUBCOM WORK SESSION JAN18 02:00 RM207,LOB FOR: C
  • January 25, 1994: RESCHED SUBCOM WORK SESS JAN25 02:00 RM207,LOB FOR: COMMERCE
  • February 1, 1994: //CANCELLED//SUBCOM WORK SESS FEB09 01:00 RM207,LOB FOR: COMM
  • February 10, 1994: RESCHED SUBCOM WK SESS FEB10 01:00 RM207,LOB :COMMERCE
  • March 9, 1994: MAJ REPORT OTP/AM FOR MAR15 (VOTE 12-1;CC)
  • March 9, 1994: PROP COMM AM<5423>; HC32,PC966-967
  • March 15, 1994: PASSED WITH AM; HJ39,P1287 + 1348
  • March 24, 1994: INTRODUCED AND REF TO PUBLIC AFFAIRS; SJ10,P258
  • April 13, 1994: HEARING APR13 01:00 RM212,LOB FOR: PUBLIC AFFAIRS
  • April 20, 1994: COMM REPORT REF FOR STUDY APR21
  • April 21, 1994: REFERRED TO INTERIM STUDY VV; SJ12,P305

Laws It Would Change

Related Bills

  • HB 1102 (1996): requiring manufactured housing park owners to compensate residents for relocation costs due to a change in land use of the park.

From the General Court